Jul
25
2009

Greendale Community Theatre's RENT: The Musical

Posted at 05:00 PM

In Section: Curtains Posted By: Russ Bickerstaff
 

STUFFY BACKGROUND CRITICISM

At it’s core, the idea for Billy Aronson and Jonathan Larson’s 1993 musical RENT isn’t entirely bad. Doing a modern interpretation of Puccini’s La boheme set in modern-day New York could, in theory, bring the unique concerns of a culture “on the edge of the millennium” into a very contemporary exploration of the life of young, urban countercultural artists, hipsters and intellectuals. Aronson’s desire to present the whole thing against the coarseness of modern day New York is an interesting idea.

The problem with RENT is that it’s a Broadway-style musical. The polished perfection of an art form the idealizes life (and really, who hasn’t waned to sing something perfect and passionate complete with choreography and musical accompaniment when threatened with eviction?) is intrinsically at odds with the gritty, urban, early ‘90’s bohemian artist culture it’s trying to present. The resulting musical feels like a cheap mockery of itself and its subject matter with a few catchy, admiitedly heartfelt songs. And don’t even get me started on the plot, which is exceptionally bad.


The prospect of a community theatre production of the musical, however, shows a great deal of potential. The raw energy of people exploring the stage for the first time could, in theory, offset some of the artificiality of the Broadway musical format and get at the heart of what makes the milieu of RENT so interesting to begin with. Impressively ambitious on a number of different levels, the Greendale Community Theatre production of the musical delivers on a fair amount of this potential.

THE SHOW


Walking into the Greendale High School Auditiorium, the scope of the production’s ambition is apparent. Modeled after the set of the Broadway show, the Brain Bzdawka/Patrick Doran set has a very studied grungy urban feel to it. The band plays behind a chain link fence. There’s a railing going-up to a second floor landing, plastic chairs and cheap tables. And there are several video monitors . . . beaming with the musical’s logo.

Robert Postotnik, who did extensive work on the production, opens the show by way of introduction in the role of filmmaker Mark Cohen.  Cohen’s performance as Mark really shines in very precise comic moments, but the deeper, more illusive drama of the character (which would feel a bit cliché in any production) never quite resolves into sharp, compelling focus. Postotnik performs his own choreography with a wiry, thin precision that most of the rest of the cast is able to keep up with. Postotnik also contributed video segments which appear on the screens throughout the production to help set mood and tone.

After Mark’s introduction and the inevitable launch into the title song, the musical is well under way. The gritty imperfections of a cast just getting to know its way around a stage largely work to the production’s favor here. The towering Roger Davis has an aggressive anger about him that adds a very organic feel to the love story between he and Mimi. Stephanie Staszak’s performance as Mimi takes a little while to settle-in. The opening scene between her and Davis is a bit weak. Staszak doesn’t quite have the kind of weak, shakiness that James Jones describes when they first meet. Staszak doesn’t quite manage to overcome a sweetness about her in that first scene and comes across as a strikingly healthy drug addict early on. As the performance progresses, her charm settles-in and the love story between James and Mimi gains a great degree of emotional weight. Yes, there are points in the show where the music doesn’t quite come together and there are areas of extremely polished precision, but this production really thrives on emotion. Robby Schuettpelz is particularly powerful exuding grief as Tom Collins when the man he loves dies. 

THE COMPARISON


There’s a weird prejudice about community theatre that people really need to get beyond. Community theatre is not bad simply because it is community theatre. I caught the National Tour of the show when it came to Milwaukee in October of ’07. I had a lot more fun at the Greendale production for a number of reasons.

First of all—the touring Broadway production had a smooth precision to it that moved from song to song with the poise of theatre professionals. Which was exceedingly boring. The occasional imbalance and discord from the GCT production gave the kind of organic feel to the show that made it all the more appealing. This is not to say that ALL the imperfections were working in favor of the production. The body mics on the performers (and the sound in general) popped, dropped out, and on one occasion buzzed . . . there’s really no way to do RENT without amplified sound, there’s no getting around it. It was a major distraction at key moments. The one favorable bit that came out of this happened halfway into the initial meeting between Mimi and James. Staszak’s mic cut out and she had the opportunity to do roughly half of her end of the Light My Candle duet acoustically. Staszak didn’t slow down a bit . . . almost instantly adjusting to the lack of amplification by adjusting her volume. Admittedly it's a completely different set-up with the big guys and they have numerous other concerns, but the sound cuts out at some point in every touring Broadway show I've ever seen. And I've never seen a professional touring actor effectively adjust for the mic drop-out. Not once. Staszak's got potential.

Then there’s the physical end of things . . .the US Tour of RENT is a Broadway in a box affair . . .performed here at the Milwaukee Theatre with the kind of distance from the actors that eliminates a lot of the appeal of live theatre to begin with—(the standard touring Broadway complaint.) While far from being a studio theatre production, the GCT production brings the show much closer to the audience.

And then there’s the community theatre aspect . . . the audience is that much more connected to a production when it’s local people. During intermission, a woman sitting next to me said that she was Robert Postotnik’s neighbor. I also overheard conversation from parents and friends of the cast, one of whom was going to see his daughter in nearly every performance.

There’s a kind of energy there that you don’t get with a group of people paying ridiculous prices for a touring Broadway show. People are more detached and disinterested and the actors can’t help but be affected by the energy in a room. The energy in the Greendale High School auditorium is amazing. Laura MacDonald’s performance as Maureen in Over The Moon was particularly memorable in this respect. Aided by clever little primitive animations on the video screen, MacDonald had the right kind of weird, exotic energy for the song—and even if the touring Broadway production had that kind of uniquely bizarre power to it, it didn’t elicit the kind of response from the audience that one got with the GCT. The theatre reverberated with the mooing of the audience—for a moment, the theatre felt like an alien landscape. The biggest hit of the musical—the one everyone knows--the one after intermission has a kind of genuine emotion on the stage and in the seats that I’ve rarely felt. I woke-up this morning with "125,600" running through my head this morning and oddly, I didn't mind . . .  

And now I’m going to stop talking about the show. I promise. At least, until next May when The Skylight Production hits the stage (providing things don’t completely fall apart with the company between now and then.) It should be an interesting contrast between the other two prodctions I’ve seen . . . 

The GCT’s production of RENT runs through August 1st at the Greendale High School Auditiorum.

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Can a "Stuffy Background Criticism" section become standard fare for your blogs?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I couldn't take my eyes off of the girl who played Mimi. I'm glad they didn't waste such a pretty sweet face by turning her into a drugged out skank! I'm going again tonight!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Did anyone else who has seen this production think it GROSSLY mirrored the version from Broadway on DVD. 3 songs in, my mouth fell open...I couldn't believe it. It was to the point where the original director and choreographer should've gotten credit because what I saw was copyright infringement. I even read the directors notes this morning to see if he even addressed why they mimicked 94% of the DVD. Nope...took credit for it all. It started to be a let down because I knew exactly what would happen with what characters and where there was nothing new brought to the show. The show wasn't bad, there were some really VERY talented cast members in it. The show was good but the director cannot get any credit for it. Kudos to the kids that worked so hard up there but shame on you director...you took credit for work that was not yours...appalling.

 

RentLvr--have you ever been to a touring Broadway production? Guess what...it's directed by a different director than the original, and choreographed by a different choreographer, yet it's still the same as the original version. Or have you ever seen a script yourself? The scripts often have the exact same stage directions printed in the script, with implicit directions to NOT change them. Yes, I realize many directors do change them, but they are by no means required to. I applaud this director for keeping true to the intent of the original director. Too often, directors think they "know better than others" and try to change too much. I give KUDOS to the director for giving the audience a chance to experience something as close to the original version as possible. Have you ever heard the quote “Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery?” I would think the original director would be thrilled that future productions are utilizing the work that he did. Since when it stage movement “copyrighted”??? Additionally, you mention that there was “nothing new brought to this show.” That is very short-sighted. If you truly have seen this show many times before, you would know that the video elements are something that have never been seen before in a production of Rent, and add a great deal to this show. Nowhere did I see the director or choreographer taking any credit. In fact, the directors' notes talk almost solely about the story being told, the importance of telling the story in communities that may not be exposed to this culture. Many directors talk about “my show” in the program notes—nowhere did I read anything like that. I'm sorry you feel the way you do--but perhaps you should give credit to the director for having the guts to put together an extremely challenging show with an incredibly talented group of individuals. Direction isn't always about stage movement--it's about getting the most of out the people he or she is working with. This director clearly accomplished that mission, and I bet if you asked the actors in this show, I'm sure you would get a similar response.

 

In the defense of the director, he explained right from the beginning that we will take creative liberties where we can, however, a show with a following like Rent is expected by the audience to look a certain way. But in no way did he deny us creative liberty with our characters. He never told anyone to mimic the Broadway show. He simply gave the basic blocking and let us do the rest with the emotion of our characters. La Vie Boheme, with the exception of a few of the beginning moves, was an original vision of our choreographer, as was Contact and Santa Fe. He also was the one who spent long restless hours making those videos that play on the monitors to compliment the show. The other response was correct, the script has very detailed direction in there that is hard to stray from. You will rarely see a version of Without You where Collins does not carry a dying Angel around the tables in the same part of the song every time, or Seasons of Love where the company doesn't stand in a line across the stage. The Out Tonight choreography is almost always the same, given the talent of the actress playing Mimi, and quite frankly, I feel we're incredibly lucky to have a Mimi that can perform that song at the same caliber of the Broadway performers. In fact, she's better than some of the Mimi's I've seen who get paid for it! The intention of our director, aside from effectively delivering the important message of the show, was to give the audience a professional show without the expensive Broadway price. He believed in the talent of our cast enough to make it look as authentic as possible. And our amazing crew even built that set in 7 days, so I give them all the credit they deserve. I'm really very sorry if you don't agree with it, but as a cast member, I very much understand why the show looks the way it does, and the audience seems to be loving it and their emotional connection is all that really matters to me, and I'm sure my cast mates will agree. I hope you still enjoyed the show, and thank you for your nice words about the talent of the cast.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I saw RENT which Brian directed. He kept the look and feel of the original show and added his signature to the show. That is the sign of a extremely talented director. Many just watch the video, or see the show many times and copy. There are no copyright laws...ok, they have tried to sue many productions...but can't. Lets face it who has seen CHORUS LINE without the original opening and ending choreograhpy not copied. The public expects to see some numbers exactly as the original. Yet, a strong director can add their own personal touch. Brian did that in my eyes, and I have personally directed many musicals. I loved Brians creative touch. I think the Skylight Theater should just take this production and mount it this Spring. Why try to cast or mount a new production in Milwaukee; when Milwaukee already has a professional looking, and awesome production of one of the best shows since HAIR and CHORUS LINE. RENT is about our times, and will remain in our hearts forever. Too bad we lost the author and composer at a very young age. Please go and see this brilliant production!

 

Wow "Creative" that is a GREAT idea. Better yet, why not have just one solitary creative concept and cast for every show written ever and then all the theatre companies can use the same one. That way no new perspectives or people will EVER be seen. Nailed it "Creative"...nailed it. Look I saw the show, it was good but lets not get crazy...just cool your jets.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
When one sees a production of talented performers....and tech and sound better then the touring company, well it needs to be expressed. Maybe we did not see the same show. The video work and sound was also quality. . And for community theater is had the look and quality that Bay View Players had for years under the direction of Charmaine DeNoyer; before she retired. Every production could have played the PAC to standing ovations. Congrats to RENT.....very strong work!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I did not mean to offend anyone with my comment. I will cool my jets. I just happened to walk out on a professional touring RENT that played the RIVERSIDE. I just thought the tech and sound at Greendale was well done. I was watching people who volunteered their time. What do I know anyway, I am old. Maybe the casts energy made my heart beat faster, and blood went to parts of my body that don't get as excited as they used to! It felt GOOD!

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
SAG_Click2012.jpg
BOM_Winners_410x93.jpg
ShepDrink_092911_410x93.jpg
Cover_300x344_02_09_12.jpg

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>