Jun
03
2008

In Defense of Weezer's Confusing New Album

Posted at 06:00 PM

In Section: On Music Posted By: Evan Rytlewski
- Since Weezer died a decade ago, fans have had a difficult time reconciling themselves with the parasitic monster that assumed the band’s corpse. At times this new, faux Weezer made a convincing case that they were the same, power-pop-loving lads as always. Faux Weezer’s 2001 green album certainly sounded like the work of the vintage band. But when held to a mirror that album gave no reflection. The hooks were there, the soul wasn’t. Where real Weezer filled its songs with incisive self-reflection, faux Weezer wrote from a safe emotional distance.

Faux Weezer’s misfire-laden 2005 chart-topper Make Believe set the bar so low that anything that followed was bound to sound better by comparison. So if nothing else, the band’s new, self-titled “red” album is a vast improvement over that career low, which is surprising considering it stubbornly revisits everything about that album that didn’t work: the spaghetti-at-wall mentality, the middle-school humor, the half-raps, the superficial pop culture critiques, the meathead pandering.

But at least this time around, faux Weezer doesn’t try to pretend it’s still the Weezer of yore. Instead of feigning blue-album earnestness, faux Rivers Cuomo now adopts a mock-macho, not-afraid-of-you-and-I-will-beat-your-ass persona which, in its overt fakeness, actually feels more real than any other persona he’s worn in years. “I am the greatest man that ever lived,” he boasts, doubling down on the cockiness. “If you don’t like, you can shove it/ But you don’t like it, you love.”

The red album is a weird, fucking Stanford prison experiment of an album. It’s difficult to tell where Cuomo’s facetiousness begins and where it ends, and the songs are similarly ambiguous. They cycle through so many genres—in addition to Weezer’s signature power-pop, there are overblown nods to commercial rock, rap-rock and classic-rock—that they can be read as both loving homages to radio rock and a spiteful send ups of it. Love it or hate it—and, to be sure, early reviews have already laid out plenty of fair reasons to hate this album—there’s a spark and vision driving this record that Weezer’s post-Pinkerton output has sorely lacked.

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I'm not going to jump on the bandwagon that claims Weezer peeked with Pinkerton and haven't done any good since. I won't even jump on the bandwagon of folks whose revisionist thinking has anointed Pinkerton as the best Weezer album. I will say, however, that Weezer ain't what they used to be. They seem stuck in a roller coaster type rut of making a good album then following it up with a poor one. I really liked Maladroit and, in my opinion, I think it's their best album to date. They followed that up with the above mentioned stinker, Make Believe; which, I agree, was the lowest point in the history of Weezer recordings. Naturally, the follow that with a "good" recording (the Red album.) True, it's made better by comparison to Make Believe. True, it doesn't hold a candle to the Blue album or the nostalgia of Pinkerton. It does, however, offer some catchy pop songs and powerful guitar hooks/riffs. It good. Not great. But I'll take a good Weezer album over most other recording any day.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
2009-11-11
2010-03-17

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr