Home / News Features /  Scott Walker’s Slippery Rhetoric
  Share
Wednesday, November 25,2009

Scott Walker’s Slippery Rhetoric

County executive’s record includes increased spending and taxes

By Cory Liebmann
 
There are few things that people dislike more than fast-talking politicians. The perception is that they will say and do anything to get the next vote and win the next election.

Unfortunately this perception has long become the reality of Scott Walker’s time as Milwaukee county executive. Walker has been on all sides of many issues, including the two that he has made central to his campaign for governor: taxes and spending. While Walker wants the voters to perceive of him as a no-tax-increase budget hawk, the reality is that Walker has allowed the county’s spending to swell by more than a third, and its taxes to increase by almost 20%.

Scott Walker’s proposed budget for 2003—his first as county executive—suggested $1,100,274,125 in county spending. His proposed budget for 2010 suggested $1,481,577,120 in government spending. That amounts to a 35% increase in spending during his time as county executive.

Even looking at his budgets from one year to the next reflects a significant spending increase. In his proposed 2009 budget Walker suggested spending $1,426,815,877. In his 2010 budget, Walker suggests spending a total of $1,481,577,120. That is a 3.9% increase in Milwaukee County spending from one year to the next. Such an increase in spending could be completely necessary, but advocating for it in your budget while at the same time attacking it on the campaign trail is the worst kind of double talk. 

A recent analysis by One Wisconsin Now found that Walker’s double standards on government spending go way back to his days as a state representative. The group found that he “voted for five straight state budgets, which increased state budget spending from $26.6 billion to nearly $49 billion.” That Walker-approved spending was an increase of more than $22 billion, or 84%. Once again, even the slipperiest politician may find it difficult to explain Walker’s anti-spending rhetoric with that kind of big-spending record. 

Walker Approved Tax Increases

Any Scott Walker campaign speech will also include a full dose of bumper-sticker slogans against higher taxes. But Walker runs into a problem between his talking points and reality on that issue as well. In his proposed budget for 2003, Walker suggested a $218,708,524 tax levy. In his 2010 budget he suggests $257,637,284. That is nearly a $40 million (18%) increase over his time as county executive. These are his own numbers from his own proposed budgets and he should have to explain them to his supporters.

Even when you look at his tax levy proposals from one year to the next, you see that he is playing a shell game. He spends most of the previous year fighting the Milwaukee County Board on their slight tax levy increase, which he and everyone else realizes is necessary in order to balance the budget. To prove that point, in the following budget cycle Walker goes back not to his tax levy, but to the realistic one from the County Board as the starting point for his next budget. It is a behind-the-scenes admission that the slight increase that he fought the previous year was actually necessary in the first place. 

Given the kind of economic hardship that many are facing in our community, the last thing we need is another politician who is perfectly willing to say anything to get our vote. This is a serious time that requires serious leaders who are willing to level with the public and make the hard decisions. There is no time for double talk and slippery talking points because they only complicate the problems that we already face.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Talk about “slippery”! How about slippery reporting and slippery think tanks? First of all, Walker advocates a no-increase IN SPENDING budget, both on the campaign trail and in his budget proposals. There are costs, such as interest payments and pension contributions that will increase each year no matter what Walker or the board choose to propose. Walker proposes cost-saving measures and spending decreases every single year. The county board then removes these measures from the budget or adds spending initiatives back into the budget. Walker then vetoes most of these changes. The county board then overrides the vetoes. Because the board can override Walker’s vetoes (due to its largely liberal membership), Walker then starts the next budget proposal with a higher levy and budget proposal- how else would it happen, given the actions of the county board? As for One Wisconsin Now- this is an org that doesn’t even pretend to be non-partisan. It is funded by the Institute for One Wisconsin, which is run exclusively by liberals, most of whom have worked for the Democratic Party in one capacity or another. Talk about slippery- not one single word from this organization can be taken without a grain of salt. This reporting is shameful, but seriously- how ignorant would one have to be to think that Tom Barrett would spend less as governor than Scott Walker?

 

Republicans are bankrupt comrade. I could continue to toy with the so-called conservative ideology, I could maybe even pull something out of Right Web. But I'd like to smash your idea of this so-called liberal institution and this may also apply to the myth of the so-called liberal media. But before I do, let me point out that the word liberal is a loaded word that contains many definitions. First and foremost, there's Adam Smiths liberal economic theory, which has spawned economic fundamentalism like a religion. Then there's Neo-liberalism wreaking havoc on UNDERdeveloped nations. Then there's the very distortion of the word projected onto the power structure of oppression, which is then used to both discourage and scare people away from becoming politically active. But another function it serves is its a codeword for black, minority, and poor people with sexist, xenophobic, racist undertones. But I'm not here to defend democrats, so I'd like to move forward shall we... Although Sourcewatch came up empty, I did find reference to its alliance with George Soros Open Society Institute. Sourcewatch then reveals: "The goal of the Agency (CIA) was exactly the same as that of the Open Society Fund: to dismantle socialism. In South Africa, the CIA sought out dissidents who were anticommunist. In Hungary, Poland and the USSR, the CIA, with overt intervention from the National Endowment for Democracy, the AFL-CIO, USAID and other institutions, supported and organized anticommunists, the very type of individuals recruited by Soros' Open Society Fund. The CIA would have called them "assets." As Soros said, "In each country I identified a group of people - some leading personalities, others less well known - who share my belief..." Soros' Open Society organized conferences with anticommunist Czechs, Serbs, Romanians, Hungarians, Croatians, Bosnians, Kosovars. His ever-expanding influence gave rise to suspicions that he was operating as part of the U.S. intelligence complex. In 1989, the Washington Post reported charges first made in 1987 by the Chinese government officials that Soros' Fund for the Reform and Opening of China had CIA connections." These so-called liberal institutions serve to preserve the social and economic order of capitalism using reformist methods to subvert socialist revolution using gradualist politrikkks. Here's a great analysis...(http://juneterpstra.com/about.html)...I could also add to this and mention MLK's Beyond Vietnam speech. Ultimately, civil rights and labor unions also served the interests of the power structure by not only legitimizing the system, but surrendering it's power to overthrow it by defusing revolution from occurring. Globalization then reincarnated into a strategic springboard with delusions of full-spectrum dominance on the horizon in the long war of urban warfare.

 

If Scott Walker was true to his rhetoric, he would return to he same base budget every year. Nothing stops him from doing that.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
What a load of crap! Walker inherited a bloated and deeply troubled county budget from Democrats who had decided to give retirees millions of dollars in benefits at retirement based on flawed data. In addition, he has been outnumbered in every year since he took over by Democrats that love to spend money on their pet projects (fish farm, etc.). When you get overridden on your budget by the board members each year, its hard to put accurate numbers to how well he has done in budgeting. I can tell you this much though, any person who thinks that Barrett, etc. would do a better fiscal job of managing the budget is an idiot. The answer isnt just raise taxes again, we pay enough! Liebmann is clearly in the pocket of the Democrats.

 

Assuming he pulls the wool over the eyes of the electorate and wins, can we rely on Mr. Walker's supporters to blame Governor Doyle for his inability to get anything done six years after he is elected Governor? If he does get elected, please warn anyone who uses a state facility to bring toilet paper, cleaning supplies and plungers.

 

If he were a Democrat, isn't this the point where the Republicans would accuse him of merely finger-pointing and laying blame rather than taking ownership of his problems and working to correct them?

 

Can’t have it both ways; his two-face spending is the problem, not the unions.  

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
SAG_Click2012.jpg
BOM_Winners_410x93.jpg
ShepDrink_092911_410x93.jpg
Cover_300x344_02_09_12.jpg

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>