Home / News / Taking Liberties /  Clouds of Hatred
  Share
Wednesday, September 16,2009

Clouds of Hatred

By Joel McNally
 

 When a bozo Republican congressman shouts “You lie!” at the president of the United States speaking to a joint session of Congress, he is trashing age-old rules of decorum requiring politicians who hate each other’s guts to politely address one another on the floor of Congress as “the distinguished gentleman from…”

 When a president telling schoolchildren to work hard and listen to their teachers is attacked for spreading Socialist propaganda, school officials in Wisconsin and elsewhere are so terrorized by the irrational complaints they make listening to the president’s uplifting speech “optional.”

 Even more frightening, in a country that has lost its most idealistic, charismatic leaders, white and black, to political assassination, extremists have begun showing up at presidential speeches around the country openly carrying assault rifles.

 These gathering clouds of hatred have been building in just the few, short months since President Barack Obama made history by becoming the first African American elected to the presidency.

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd said that for a long time she was reluctant to believe race was the primary basis for “the shrieking lunacy of the summer—the frantic efforts to paint our first black president as the Other, a foreigner, socialist, fascist, Marxist, racist, Commie Nazi…” But when she heard South Carolina Republican Joe Wilson shout at President Obama, she heard “an unspoken word in the air: You lie, boy!” She’s now convinced “some people just can’t believe a black man is president and will never accept it.”

 As someone who has participated in civil rights and anti-war rallies, I would never deny the right to Americans to stand up and disagree with the policies of their country or their president. We don’t have to go back very many months to a president who used the tragedy of 9/11 and nonexistent weapons of mass destruction to justify going to war against a country that had no connection, resulting in the loss of more American lives than the attack of Sept. 11.

 But while all of us are entitled to our own opinions, we are not entitled to our own facts.

 The irony was congressional clown Wilson yelled “You lie!” at President Obama when the president was refuting one of the many lies Wilson’s party had circulated to try to kill health care reform by any sleazy means necessary.

 Television enhanced the effectiveness of Obama’s health care speech by contrasting the president’s upbeat reform message with the reactions from the glowering cast of Grumpy Old Men on the Republican side of the chambers.

 Obama praised Republicans by name and welcomed any who wanted to help solve the problems that all but the very wealthiest Americans have in receiving affordable health care.

 Wilson may have been the most uncouth in his party, but he was by no means an exception. Republicans laughed derisively, held up cheesy signs, shook fistfuls of papers at the president and walked out.

 Generosity of Spirit

 The truly moving part of Obama’s speech came near the end when he quoted from a letter written by the late Edward Kennedy for delivery after his death.

 Obama said Kennedy’s concern for health care for all Americans came in part from his personal experience of having two children stricken with cancer. Coming from a wealthy family, Kennedy was able to imagine how much worse it would be in the same situation without insurance or without means.

 “That largeheartedness—that concern and regard for the plight of others—is not a partisan feeling,” Obama said. “It is not a Republican or a Democratic feeling. It, too, is part of the American character—our ability to stand in other people’s shoes. A recognition that we are all in this together; that when fortune turns against one of us, others are there to lend a helping hand.”

 It wasn’t a lie, exactly. But Obama’s rhetorical generosity toward Republicans was an example of the president’s own largeheartedness.

 Sadly, it is only the Democrats now who are putting themselves in the shoes of the nearly 50 million people who are without health care in this country and the millions more who are forced into bankruptcy by catastrophic illness.

 Rather than displaying character and bigheartedness, Republicans have consciously adopted tactics that are small-minded and mean-spirited.

 The good news is Obama’s election showed that ugliness and anger are losing their effectiveness in American politics. The television visual during Obama’s speech clearly showed far more elected politicians standing and cheering compared to the minority of sour-faced Republicans on the side of the room where all the light appeared to be sucked out.

 Republicans are using hatred and lies to denigrate the presidency itself in ways the presidency has never before been disrespected in our history.

 It’s not just coincidence this is happening when, for the first time in history, the office is occupied by a black man.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
There is mention about illegals not being covered in the bill, but there is nothing about enforcement. Wilson was right, Obama lied. And it has nothing, nothing to do with race.

 

I'll bet you need a SSN to get coverage!

 

To get "coverage"? To the average illegal immigrant, "coverage" is walking into an emergency room, which is paid for, ultimately, through our insurance premiums. I have no problem with this- we can't sanction coverage for illegals, but we can't have people walking the streets with infectious diseases or dangling bloody limbs. But no, there was no enforcement method in the bill I read.

 

Re 'Obama is a Marxist' We have a democracy, not a dictatorship, let alone one of the proletariat. Republicans lost their majority in Washington, DC. We have majority rule. In a very limited sense, the majority "dictates" to the minority, which still has rights. Is that what you mean by calling Obama a Marxist? If so, how pathetic. Or, are you concerned that the majority will vote to raise the taxes of the rich few, and then redistribute the wealth? I think that is likely your primary concern. But how do you explain that Obama has so far favored Wall Street interests? He has explicitly endorsed the idea of America as a place where you can get rich and be rewarded for your work. He has won the support of many prominent wealthy Americans and business interests. Does any country in the world, let alone the US under President Obama, call for the equal distribution of goods and services? I do not think any do. But President Obama has noticed that real wages for ordinary Americans have declined for decades, while CEOs have received a hugely disproportionate share of earnings, and many have even been rewarded -- sometimes at taxpayers expense -- for failure. Your rhetoric strikes me as a form of McCarthyism, and it is scary to me personally as I happen to live among people who are likely to think that having a copy of "The Communist Manifesto" on your bookshelf (a REQUIRED text in a college world history course!) makes one a Communist or a Marxist or, at least, a socialist.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
When Obama says his Obamacare will not raise the deficit one dime, and the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office says it will, Obama did lie. I'm sending Wilson a big check.

 

Over the long term, the CBO says health care reform will save money. And contrary to GOP claims, the reform will lead to lower Medicare and prescription drug costs.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Harry Reid still has not apologized for calling former President Bush a liar. Wilson should have apologized right after Reid.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
1.) All you Neo-Conservatives commenting here are pinheads. Naive, inane pinheads! 2.) Harry Reid didn't disgrace the decorum of the congressional floor when he called Bush a liar. To compare Reid to Wilson is petty and childish; which is in lockstep with Neo-Conservative behavior. 3.) Sen. Baucus outline that the Health Care Plan WOULD NOT raise the deficit. Get your facts straight, pinheads!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
A sweeping generalization that all who criticize the President for actions or polices which are not approved is flawed thinking. Consider the following: Is criticizing a sports team manager, who happens to be black, for a teams lack of performance considered racially motivated. How about being critical of Barney Frank - anti gay? Critical of Carl Levin - antisemitic? Robert Byrd - age discrimination? I would be curious to know some of the peoples stances here, as well as Mr. McNally's, in regards to Michael Steele being referred to as "Stepin Fetchit" or Condoleezza Rice noted as "Aunt Jemima". I researched Mr. McNally's various columns and could find nothing on the subject. In regards to "meepos", true the CBO suggested the deficit would not rise - immediately.. Read a little further...the CBO also takes into account a 35% increase in the excise tax on insurance plans which would ultimately be passed on to the consumer & a tax yet to be determined to raise an additional $139 billion. The plan as written would increase the deficit substantially after 2019. I am taxed enough & I am against these increases. If you have some extra cash, feel free to forward it me.

 

Robert, taxes reduce a deficit; they don't add to it. That's the nature of taxes. Conservatives and Republicans have been duped into believing that all taxes are bad. Republicans and Conservatives don't want to pay taxes for health care, but they'll pay taxes to fund a war. An estimated 42% of each dollar goes to the military, while only 20% goes to improving the nations health. And people want to complain about their tax dollars going towards health care? If Obama's Health Care plan is "Socialism," (which it's clearly not) than our military spending is "Fascist."

 

I do not want money taken out of my pocket to cover another person's health insurance - plain and simple.

 

Fascism would imply I am for a single party state - which I am not. A Fascist would also forbid and suppress criticism and opposition to the government - which I am also not for. Nice try...typical Liberal response. When backed into a corner Libs start throwing around terms they nothing about.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>