Home / News / Taking Liberties /  Teaching Intolerance
  Share
Wednesday, September 9,2009

Teaching Intolerance

By Joel McNally
 

I´ve long entertained friends with the story about the historic day our small-town elementary school almost got to see the president of the United States.

Like a lot of small towns nobody cares about, my hometown of Union City, Ind. (population: 3,622), adopted an exaggerated civic nickname to try to inflate its importance. It called itself “Hub City” because all the railroad tracks in the world crossed there.

Word got out that at a certain time on a particular day, a train carrying President Harry Truman would pass right through town. Our elementary school principal organized the entire school to line up by class to walk to the train depot to see the president.

The train wasn’t scheduled to stop, mind you. But our teachers thought there was a very good chance that the president would order the train to stop immediately when he saw our expectant throng. He would probably get out and make a speech or something.

We all walked to the depot in orderly rows. At the appointed hour, the presidential train sped through. Some maintenance guy on the caboose waved. We waved back. Then, we all walked back to school.

It really does show how times have changed. As far as I could tell growing up, the members of my immediate family were pretty much the only Democrats in that conservative, little Indiana town. Yet, the slightest possibility of glimpsing a Democratic president stirred excitement and respect.

Fast-forward to the present day, when schoolchildren have far more reason than we ever did to be excited about a historic presidency. Not only is President Barack Obama the first African American to be elected president, but he also is an inspirational leader who personifies for young people the possibility of overcoming obstacles and achieving your dreams through education and hard work.

Yet, unbelievably, when the president of the United States scheduled a televised speech to deliver that important message directly to America’s schoolchildren, an organized right-wing political attack succeeded in frightening some weak-kneed school administrators into banning the speech.

Elmbrook School District, in the conservative western suburbs of Milwaukee, has now been joined by school districts in Waukesha, Wauwatosa, West Allis-West Milwaukee, Grafton and West Bend in refusing to allow their children to hear a live message from President Obama urging them to succeed in school.

Presidents who were far less likely to inspire young people—the first President George Bush and the geriatric Ronald Reagan—both delivered televised stay-inschool messages to the nation’s schools without parental protest.

We even allowed President George W. Bush in person into a second-grade class in Florida to read “The Pet Goat” on Sept. 11, 2001, when he should have been responding to the 9/11 attacks.

So, clearly, there is something about this particular president that extremely conservative, suburban parents don’t want in their schools. Hmmm. Wonder what that could be?

Ignorant Objections

The organized objections against the presidential school address on right-wing talk radio have been nothing less than a hate campaign.

“The thing that concerned me most about it was it seemed like a direct channel from the president of the United States into the classroom, to my child,” said a Texas parent. “I don’t want our schools turned over to some socialist movement.”

Actually, Obama did not become president through some socialist movement. He was elected by a large majority of the American people in a democratic election.

Political extremists, who apparently don’t believe in democracy, ridiculously suggest there is something controversial about this particular president speaking to American schoolchildren. And cowardly school administrators reinforce that impression by making a work-hard, stay-in-school message “optional.”

Mark Steyn, a right-wing extremist from Canada appearing on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show, said Obama was trying to indoctrinate children into his own “cult of personality,” just like Saddam Hussein and North Korean leader Kim Jong-il.

Chris Stigall, a right-wing talk-show host in Kansas City, even compared Obama to a sexual predator. “I wouldn’t let my next-door neighbor talk to my kid alone,” Stigall said. “I’m sure as hell not letting Barack Obama talk to him alone.”

Administrators in the schools that have banned the presidential speech are intelligent enough to know the organized protests are absurd. But the schools’ own gutless reactions to the ridiculous protests teach terrible lessons to children.

One is that, in a democracy, the loudest bullies win no matter how extreme a fringe they represent or how nonsensical their arguments are.

The other lesson is even more poisonous to civil discourse: If you or your parents disagree with someone, you should never listen to anything that person has to say. Listening to opposing arguments might make you question the soundness of your own beliefs.

Schools that cave to right-wing protests are really teaching children ignorance and intolerance.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
very well-written, good points all around! Even if Obama was socialist it would be way better than the previous president who wasn't even elected by a popular majority (two times over). If Bush's reign doesn't represent ditatorship, I don't know what does. The right-wing is afraid to fight a fair fight and always uses bullying and ignorance to state their case. Once you eliminate the right-wing's proclivity for fear tactics from their agenda, they are as soft and helpless as a baby bird fallen from a tree. The decent, humble people of the world who want to see a sustainable, honest form of democracy will win and the Republicans facade of "democracy" will perish relatively quickly no matter how hard they try to rape the earth.

 

I'm very disappointed that when it comes to school agenda that parents are not consulted first. everything our children read and learn must be preapproved. Was his speech open to be veiwed before it was given? Just because someone, white, black, or of any other race, is President doesn't mean we have to listen. This is still America. Freedom of speech and freedom to turn off the t.v. Did our children have that freedom if they were in the class room? This doesn't make me rasist or a right wing, just makes me protective.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Regarding the kids, part of education is to engage youth in practicing critical thinking and problem solving of their own. As Mr. McNally pointed out, the Republicans are trying to keep their kids eyes from seeing the world, from seeing the perspective of their popularly elected president, from receiving encouragement from the "leader of the free world." It's not much different than burning books, people who are afraid of allowing their kids to observe the world as it is and analize media and information around them in an active way are just trying to censor information. If Obama was so bad, let your kids find out for themselves and make opinions on their own in an educated manner. I suspect they are afraid the kids will realize "hey this guy is pretty cool and way more honest and human than the last president I saw, I like this guy."

 

I don't think Republicans are try to keep their kids from listening to Obama. Remember these are the best and brightest children. They read the Wall Street Journal, listen to the news channels, and study economics and politics in school. I'm sure they can draw their own conclusions without having to hear some kindergarten level speech.

 

"Not much different from burning books"?? I disagree with the uproar over this speech, which turned out to be toothless and weak, but you are insane to compare this to burning books in any way. And by the way, Bush is gone- get over it and concentrate on the present.

 

If you think Bush is "gone" you may be relatively right, but his policies are still impacting our lives and if you forget history you forget the present. But maybe that's an "insane" thing to think about.

 

No, as I clearly stated, it is insane to compare this issue to book burning. I'm not sure how I can state it so that you'll understand. By the way, the Congress has been controlled by Democrats for years. Now you have the executive branch, and sometimes the judicial. Why is nothing changing? Interesting. But not insane to think about.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I read the Express every week once release, but the over blatant left wing liberalism you people show is bad news. Let me first say, that the "conservative west suburbs" you complain about not showing his speech produce some of the highest scores in the state! You complain about how nobody respects our president, there is a difference between hatred and a working democracy. Sorry we don't want to waste this valuable education time you so heavily covet standing outside watching Obama's plane fly by in hope he stops and says hello. You talk about allowing Bush to enter a school to read a book during the 9/11 attacks, while in actuality the attacks happened WHILE HE WAS READING THE BOOK. And the way he responded once knowing about the attacks was the way he was supposed too. Since Obama has entered office his approval and disapproval ratings have moved negatively. We don't hate him because he's black or because he's a democrat, its because he was one of the most liberal democrats in senate trying to push a very liberal agenda as president. I'd appreciate a column sometime where I can read it and have some respect for what is said. Because this is TERRIBLE.

 

Sort of agree with Patrick. School districts like Elm Brook don't need motivational speechs to stay in school. Heck, they graduate about 99% of their students and most of them go on to college. Dude, Obama would just be preach'n to the choir. The under achievers in Miwaukee are the ones who should listen. Believe me Joel, if Obama was going to be making at stop in Elm Grove on Amtrak, you can bet the students would be there then. But they are not going to waste time being talked down to like they were some inner city kids.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
It's disappointing to think of all the parents who are trying to guard their own children from thinking for themselves. How do you think elementary students become intolerant and spawn ideas of prejudice? It is instances like these that allow racism and misconceptions to thrive in our society, instead of teaching our children to be open-minded, hear both sides before formulating an opinion, and become accepting. It is not just about a liberal agenda. You couldn't believe some of the interviews I have seen of conservative parents from southern states, one claiming that, "I don't want him talkin' about that communism stuff." You can call views such as these anything you want; I call them ignorant.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I find it interesting that Mr. McNally writes about tolerance, or should I state, intolerance and ignorance. It was only six months ago when he wrote a scathing editorial about how deplorable it was for the Elmbrook school district to hold its secular graduation ceremonies at Elmbrook Church. What was he afraid of then, "question the soundness of your own beliefs"? I personally thought the president addressing school kids was appropriate and should be an annual event. But, let's be honest with each other and apply the ignorance and intolerance label consistently across both sides.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
SAG_Click2012.jpg
BOM_Winners_410x93.jpg
ShepDrink_092911_410x93.jpg
Cover_300x344_02_09_12.jpg

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>