Home / News Features /  MPS Mayoral Takeover Opponents Say They’ll Fight On
  Share
Wednesday, August 26,2009

MPS Mayoral Takeover Opponents Say They’ll Fight On

Plus: Board President Bonds releases an accountability report

By Lisa Kaiser
 

Opponents of a mayoral takeover of the Milwaukee Public Schools said the change would not help the district compete for federal money, nor would it improve student performance or accountability.

At a press conference at City Hall on Monday, opponents of the takeover said the attempt to replace the democratically elected school board with one appointed by the mayor threatens the gains made by the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The governance change would require a modification of state law enacted by the state Legislature and the governor. It’s unlikely Milwaukee residents would have the opportunity to vote on the takeover.

Milwaukee Alderman Tony Zielinski, who organized Monday’s press conference, said what’s at stake is “the fundamental right to vote.”

Jerry Ann Hamilton, head of the Milwaukee chapter of the NAACP, said the takeover must be placed in the context of the black community’s long struggle to obtain equal voting rights. The proposed takeover would have the effect of disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of Milwaukee voters.

“We are disappointed that the governor, the mayor and the superintendent of the Department of Public Instruction conducted little outreach to the affected communities before proposing such radical reforms,” Hamilton said.

 

Bonds Says Votes Are Not for Sale

MPS Board President Michael Bonds, who resigned from the mayor’s MPS advisory council because he refused to go along with the governance change, said Gov. Jim Doyle, Mayor Tom Barrett and state Superintendent Tony Evers were “misleading the public” by implying that a mayoral takeover of MPS would make Wisconsin more likely to receive federal “Race to the Top” money.

Bonds pointed out that Wisconsin’s education system doesn’t fit the criteria for these funds, which will be distributed by Education Secretary Arne Duncan.

“Milwaukee votes are not for sale,” Bonds said. State Rep. Christine Sinicki (D-Milwaukee), a former MPS board member, said that elected representatives would be more responsive than appointed board members to the needs of constituents.

Sinicki, vice chair of the Assembly’s Education Reform Committee—which is chaired by state Rep. Annette Polly Williams (D-Milwaukee), who also opposes the takeover—said she would block any bill that would change control of MPS to an appointed board.

“If a bill is drafted, it’ll die,” Sinicki said. “If it doesn’t die, I’ll amend it to include all districts in the state.”

Williams said the state Legislature would not vote to strip away the power of another democratically elected body. “There are not the votes in the state for this,” Williams said.

It’s About the Kids, Mayor Says

The City Hall press conference took place on the first day Mayor Barrett returned to work, following his attack after leaving the State Fair.

Barrett issued a response after the press conference: “To show up at an organized press event and summarily dismiss MPS governance reform without acknowledging our children’s educational needs or the facts about MPS educational outcomes is either a sad sign of self-interest or a deliberate attempt to run from the facts.”

Barrett said MPS leads the nation in the racial achievement gap, has an “unacceptably high” high school dropout rate and is facing huge financial challenges.

But MPS Board member Terry Falk said that mayoral takeovers in other cities “are not a panacea.”

He pointed to Chicago’s school district, which had been led by Mayor Richard Daley appointee Arne Duncan, now the secretary of education.

A study conducted by the Commercial Club of Chicago found that academic gains made by elementary students in the mayor-controlled Chicago Public Schools “appear to be due to changes in the tests made by the Illinois State Board of Education, rather than real improvements in student learning.” The study called the performance of Chicago’s high schools “abysmal.”

Falk said mayor-controlled school districts are more likely to shift resources from low-income students to middle-class areas, so a city can attract more middle-class residents.

Increased Accountability Measures

The Monday press conference wasn’t the only movement made on MPS reform. While the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Wisconsin announced their support for a mayoral takeover of MPS, Congresswoman Gwen Moore issued a statement decrying the takeover.

Moore wrote: “We will not rectify the challenges facing MPS unless we talk about poverty, teen pregnancy and the perverted policy initiatives that have exacerbated this problem for our city’s public schools. MPS is working with a flawed state funding formula that sends our public dollars to private schools outside of the city. … I fully believe that the governor and the mayor have the best intentions for MPS; however, I have yet to hear a credible explanation of how these difficult challenges get fixed by simply changing the way that our school board is chosen.”

On Tuesday, MPS Board President Bonds announced more details about the board’s recently established Office of Accountability, which is responsible for increasing transparency, oversight and accountability of MPS’s finances. The office will oversee the district’s accounting, conduct an annual systemwide analysis and make financial forecasts, monitor all contracts—including charter school contracts— and oversee all grants, endowments and donations made to the district.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I am waiting for a change from the stupidility Mps boards for number years. And now it may be finally come true. Due to the fact that these stupid school boards are driven up our money and good educational school out from MPS. They are squizing the poor and uneducate families to live under their controll by lier to the poors that they can make a better decision for the poors. They ( Boards ) need to get out and let some one whom has the better idea and more compassion for helping the poors takeover.

 

What???

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
The problems at MPS are not the fault of either the board or the system - the problem is society. If the mayor, the governor, or anyone else wants to fix MPS they need to fix society. How can we expect the schools to educate our children when so many of them come from poverty and don't even have the basic necessities of life? How can we expect them to be interested in learning when many are fighting to survive against formidable odds? We need to fix these problems and then MPS will have a chance. Changing the person in charge will not make a difference no matter who it is.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
How about classes to teach people how to be good parents?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
How can MPS expect to be supported when they don't even support themselves. My childs school has teachers with school aged children of their own that they open enroll or send to private school. So MPS is good enough for me to support and send my child to but not good enough for thiers? Does anyone see a problem with this? And if the board would support keeping the classroom size at 30 the way it is written in the contracts maybe teachers could teach, have enough resources and not feel apathetic at the end of the day. Instead of schools getting what they need they have to worry about their attendance on one day out of the school year, how many special ed kids they have and hope that their test scores are low enough (but not too low) so they can get additional funding to pay for tutors for the kids that need it. Not to mention that everytime we get a new school board there is a new prescription for fixing the system; k-8..6-12...k-12... small high schools, all reading all day, basically the concept du jour.

 

Everyone has a right to send their child where they please, but yes a teacher who teaches within MPS whom chooses not to send their children to a Public school may or may not indicate theirs a problem. The real issue is the Mayor need to attend to his own affairs like our city and let educators be on the board to make decisions. Too many board members and other big title people who make decisions and fail to have real knowledge of what it takes to run a real classroom. Another issue, the MTEA union is sooo strong that weak teachers are supported even before tenure. I dont understand this! Too many MPS funds go to Charter schools with horrible track records, principals with inappropriate cetifications, and the Suburban schools get more funds than urban schools. Sadly, the last component of why our schools are ineffective is the lack of parental support.We have more parents who lack involvement than do participate. Many times teachers feel their raising others children. How do we increase parental support?

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>