Home Taking Liberties Trickle Up
Share
Chad0
MaxHedroom
Thursday, January 24,2008
Trickle Up
Now that George Bush’s economic policies have finally put the country on the brink of financial disaster, even Republicans appear to tacitly acknowledge that the administration’s rationale for exorbitant tax breaks to the wealthy over the past seven years has been completely fraudulent.
After presiding over a milder recession in 2001, his first year in office, Bush is now desperately trying to avoid a major one in his last year. George Bush’s only domestic policy— enormous tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% and crumbs from their table for everyone else—is now officially just as big a disaster as his foreign policy, threatening U.S. and world economies.
The president, the Congress and the chairman of the Federal Reserve now agree that the only way to lessen the looming economic catastrophe is to do just the opposite of what the Bush presidency has done for its entire existence—by putting more money into the hands of the poor and the middle class.
Hey, wait a minute. Whatever happened to trickle-down economics? The trickle-down theory was that if we gave huge tax cuts to rich people they would use that money to create more jobs. More people would be working and pouring more money back into our economy, which would create even more jobs, and on and on.
Well, guess what? Trickle-down was a lie. When wealthy people get enormous tax cuts, they don’t spend the money to create more jobs. They don’t spend the money on anything at all if they can help it. They’ve already got more money than they can ever possibly spend.
What they do is put the money into tax shelters so they can avoid paying any taxes to the government on it. Since it was the government that generously awarded them those enormous financial windfalls, that sounds really ungrateful. But the government doesn’t seem to mind. After all, it was the government that set up all those handy-dandy loopholes so that the wealthy could avoid paying taxes.
Some clever guys working in the Reagan administration created the myth that trickledown economics benefited everyone. President Ronald Reagan himself may even have believed it. Reagan believed a lot of myths about welfare queens and trees causing pollution.
It turns out that enormous tax cuts for the wealthy benefit—surprise!—the wealthy. The government then has less money to spend on anything that benefits the rest of us, little things like education, health care and job creation. An Idea That Works
Even though trickle-down doesn’t work, trickle-up does. That’s why when Bush wants to boost the economy to lessen the effects of his recession, not even he has the guts to propose lavishing any more billions on his favorite welfare recipients—the wealthiest in the land.
Instead, Bush is proposing a $145 billion economic stimulus package directed at those who could be expected to spend it immediately—namely, the poor and the middle class who have been sucked dry to benefit Bush’s wealthy campaign contributors for the past seven years.
Unlike the wealthy whose enormous tax cuts might at best create a few additional jobs in the yacht-building industry, middle class and poor people who receive money from the government spend it right away, primarily on overdue bills. A sudden influx of $145 billion directly into the economy moves more consumer goods and creates more employment.
What a concept. The government directs financial benefits toward people who actually need them instead of rich folks who already have more money than they know what to do with. Then, the entire country benefits from an improved economy, not just the wealthiest 1%.
Actually, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt figured it out back in the 1930s. But Republicans have spent so many decades demonizing and trying to dismantle government programs such as welfare and Social Security that we forgot how it all worked.
Of course, after years of kicking people at the bottom in the teeth, it’s a difficult habit for some politicians to break. That’s why President Bush’s initial proposal for an economic stimulus intentionally leaves out the poorest Americans. Anyone who made too little to pay taxes wouldn’t get any money at all from the government.
A family of four with a yearly income of $40,000 a year or more would receive a full benefit of $800 for an individual or $1,600 for a couple. Below that, the benefit drops until the same family earning $24,000 a year or less gets nothing. When the idea is to put money into the hands of people who will spend it immediately, the only way to explain excluding the poorest people is sheer hatred. After all, the poorest people would spend the money the fastest.
As the great Hoosier philosopher Kin Hubbard once said, “Being poor is no crime in this country, but it might as well be.” What’s your take? Write: editor@shepex.com.
After presiding over a milder recession in 2001, his first year in office, Bush is now desperately trying to avoid a major one in his last year. George Bush’s only domestic policy— enormous tax cuts for the wealthiest 1% and crumbs from their table for everyone else—is now officially just as big a disaster as his foreign policy, threatening U.S. and world economies.
The president, the Congress and the chairman of the Federal Reserve now agree that the only way to lessen the looming economic catastrophe is to do just the opposite of what the Bush presidency has done for its entire existence—by putting more money into the hands of the poor and the middle class.
Hey, wait a minute. Whatever happened to trickle-down economics? The trickle-down theory was that if we gave huge tax cuts to rich people they would use that money to create more jobs. More people would be working and pouring more money back into our economy, which would create even more jobs, and on and on.
Well, guess what? Trickle-down was a lie. When wealthy people get enormous tax cuts, they don’t spend the money to create more jobs. They don’t spend the money on anything at all if they can help it. They’ve already got more money than they can ever possibly spend.
What they do is put the money into tax shelters so they can avoid paying any taxes to the government on it. Since it was the government that generously awarded them those enormous financial windfalls, that sounds really ungrateful. But the government doesn’t seem to mind. After all, it was the government that set up all those handy-dandy loopholes so that the wealthy could avoid paying taxes.
Some clever guys working in the Reagan administration created the myth that trickledown economics benefited everyone. President Ronald Reagan himself may even have believed it. Reagan believed a lot of myths about welfare queens and trees causing pollution.
It turns out that enormous tax cuts for the wealthy benefit—surprise!—the wealthy. The government then has less money to spend on anything that benefits the rest of us, little things like education, health care and job creation. An Idea That Works
Even though trickle-down doesn’t work, trickle-up does. That’s why when Bush wants to boost the economy to lessen the effects of his recession, not even he has the guts to propose lavishing any more billions on his favorite welfare recipients—the wealthiest in the land.
Instead, Bush is proposing a $145 billion economic stimulus package directed at those who could be expected to spend it immediately—namely, the poor and the middle class who have been sucked dry to benefit Bush’s wealthy campaign contributors for the past seven years.
Unlike the wealthy whose enormous tax cuts might at best create a few additional jobs in the yacht-building industry, middle class and poor people who receive money from the government spend it right away, primarily on overdue bills. A sudden influx of $145 billion directly into the economy moves more consumer goods and creates more employment.
What a concept. The government directs financial benefits toward people who actually need them instead of rich folks who already have more money than they know what to do with. Then, the entire country benefits from an improved economy, not just the wealthiest 1%.
Actually, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt figured it out back in the 1930s. But Republicans have spent so many decades demonizing and trying to dismantle government programs such as welfare and Social Security that we forgot how it all worked.
Of course, after years of kicking people at the bottom in the teeth, it’s a difficult habit for some politicians to break. That’s why President Bush’s initial proposal for an economic stimulus intentionally leaves out the poorest Americans. Anyone who made too little to pay taxes wouldn’t get any money at all from the government.
A family of four with a yearly income of $40,000 a year or more would receive a full benefit of $800 for an individual or $1,600 for a couple. Below that, the benefit drops until the same family earning $24,000 a year or less gets nothing. When the idea is to put money into the hands of people who will spend it immediately, the only way to explain excluding the poorest people is sheer hatred. After all, the poorest people would spend the money the fastest.
As the great Hoosier philosopher Kin Hubbard once said, “Being poor is no crime in this country, but it might as well be.” What’s your take? Write: editor@shepex.com.
Chad0
Hmmm..."brink of financial disaster"... "brink of a mild recession", ah, whatever, close enough right Joel? I'd be amazed to find out that even the most hardcore of the hardcore bleeding heart take your column seriously. The haves who are taxed to death are already propping up the have nots, who don't pay any income tax, in the form of social welfare programs. The poor get "rebates" every year in the form of various tax credits and the earned income creidit. Yet it's "sheer hatred" that will leave them with "nothing" in this one instance. Pardon me if I don't break out the violin.
MaxHedroom
http://blip.tv/file/520347
This will make you laugh!
Also in Taking Liberties:
..Search Shepherd Express
- Fri
9 - Sat
10 - Sun
11 - Mon
12 - Tue
13 - Wed
14 - Thu
15
Search in Events
2009-01-09 7:30pm
Comedy
Live! Interactive! Improv Comedy For the Whole Family! Bring the kids, bring Grandma, heck, even bring the dog! Come see the longest running comedy Show in Milwaukee.
Location: Central Milwaukee
The American political drama that began in the upheaval of the 1960s reached its climax with the Watergate scandal and ended in 1974 with the resignation of Richard Nixon. An epilogue was added to the story when Nixon emerged from seclusion in 1977 for an
In 1964, the time of Doubt, no one spoke of pedophile priests, even if the Roman Catholic Church was already riddled with them. Directed by John Patrick Shanley from his own play, one of the most provocative recent productions on a Broadway that has surre
Although the wacky, anonymous, eyeball-mask-wearing members of The Residents make a point of labeling it a collection of "pop songs," The Bunny Boy isn't simply a pop album. It's also a cryptic Internet series that "inspired" the album, a live performance
Steve Grimm's place in Milwaukee music history remains secure for having fronted one of the city's most prominent bands to make it to a major label. It's been a while since Bad Boy was a happening entity, but Grimm remains vital-if inextricably linked to
Mitchell Street was once known as the Polish Grand Avenue, the main drag for Milwaukee’s large Polish-American community. The Poles began moving away in the 1970s, making way for new chapters in the city’s immigrant story. Mitchell Street has
Little touches set it apart: the twist of lime on the rim of a glass of cranberry juice, the faux modern paintings on the wall… Ten years after it opened, Metro Bar & Cafe, just off the lobby of Hotel Metro (411 E. Mason St.), remains a timelessly
Express Milwaukee Blog Network
Conglomerate: The Marketplace of Ideas, 420 B.C.
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{mso-style-parent:"";
margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;
mso-header-margin:.5in;
mso-footer-margin:.5in;
mso-paper-source:0;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
This semester, I am teaching a seminar on liberty. The first part of the course examines different conceptions of liberty; the second part applies those ideas to a number of contemporary legal issues. (If [...]
Free Classifieds
Free Coupons
..Search Shepherd Express
