Home / Articles / Left and Right /  High-Speed Rail and Race Relations
  Share
Tuesday, March 31,2009

High-Speed Rail and Race Relations

Scott Walker is looking out for inner-city residents

By Theodore Hausmann III

Last week, Jim Doyle asked Washington for $519 million dollars to use to upgrade transit in Wisconsin. Would that money go for busses in the inner-city? Transit for the disabled? Bus ticket vouchers for homeless shelters?

The answer is none of the above. The $519 million Doyle requested (as part of the federal stimulus package) would go toward the construction of a "high-speed" rail line between Milwaukee and Madison. In this case, "high-speed" is a misnomer, as the trains on the proposed line would travel at just over 100 miles per hour, and it would still take one hour, seven minutes to go from downtown Milwaukee to Madison. Um, not quite Madison. The western terminus of the proposed line would be the Dane County Airport, located approximately 5 miles northeast of the Capitol Square in downtown Madison.

When considering the "trip time", a benchmark that measures door-to-door total trip time between destinations, one has to factor in (1) getting to the train station in Milwaukee or the airport in Madison, and (2) getting to your final destination from the train station in Milwaukee or the Madison airport. Currently, even in medium traffic, the trip by automobile from downtown Milwaukee to downtown Madison takes only one hour and thirty minutes. To gain the twenty-three minutes, one has to travel to and park at the Milwaukee train station or the Dane County Airport. Then the traveler would need to take a cab or a bus to their final destination. No can seriously believe that this "not-exactly-high-speed-rail" line would make the trip faster than one could drive it in an automobile.

Then you have to consider the cost. Even with high gas prices, the trip between Milwaukee and Madison is relatively cheap. Train tickets, if we can use Amtrak's Hiawatha line for comparison, cost upwards of $20 each way. That's a full tank of gas for a V-8 pickup truck at today's prices. Of course, parking and destination transportation need to be figured in. Even adding only $10 for these costs, the trip is far more expensive than it would be to simply drive the seventy-five miles. Even the Badger bus service is cheaper at $19 each way, or $17.50 if you order your tickets online.

Democratic politicians and rail activist groups shout loudly that mass transit is the panacea that will save our crumbling inner cities by bringing the workers to the jobs. Exactly what jobs would the people taking a train from Milwaukee to Madison be employed in? One position jumps to mind- that of local Milwaukee area politician, making the daily trip to the capital. Other than that, what can we expect the ridership numbers for this line to be? On estimate, made by "authorities" and referenced in a JS Online article, puts ridership at 1.08 million riders per year "within a couple of years after service starts". For comparison, the Amtrak Hiawatha line served 766,167 riders in 2008- and that line runs to Chicago, a city that is simply not comparable to Madison with regard to jobs, attractions, and the inconvenience that driving into the city presents.

This posting will not delve into the fact that the line will almost certainly need ongoing taxpayer funding to reach the break-even point, or that $519 million would be the final cost of building the line. These are facts that one can assume simply by looking at Amtrak's current yearly deficit, and by examining the financials of almost any government project.

The most important question is this- Where are the central-city politicians on this issue, and are they blatantly selling out their constituents to support the Democratic rail transit pipe-dream? Somehow, a rapid-transit bus system that would run down Fond Du Lac Avenue is seen as less useful to inner-city residents than Mayor Barret's trolley cars, which run in a three-mile loop downtown and don't come anywhere near the inner city. How can a fixed-rail trolley system serving white collars and tourists downtown be supported by black politicians over a bus system targeted directly at the inner city? Why is Scott Walker the one who is seen as indifferent to Milwaukee's black population?

Simple- inner city politicians don't care about their constituents, and Democrats really don't care about the underprivileged residents of the central city. Democrats care only about forcing lifestyle changes on the population, and if the inner-city is left behind, so be it. The important thing is to get those first rails laid.

To be fair, the "high-speed" train between Milwaukee and Madison would serve some residents of Milwaukee's North Side. The politicians in the central-city would be able to ride the new choo-choo to Madison- subsidized, of course, by the taxpayer.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
You make a number of good points... assuming the rail is to be built for today's needs. The transit investments now will be crucial in building the highly efficient system we will need in the near future. A few things to consider... 1) Remember the energy crisis of 2008? Well that didn't go away just because the economy went in the tank and people stopped driving as much. We still have a finite amount of fossil fuels on this planet. Anyone who thinks gas prices won't go back up above $4/gallon in the coming years is a bit too optimistic. 2) We have to start somewhere. I agree that the Madison-Milwaukee rail alone is not a good solution. The downtown streetcar loop alone is not a good solution. But if these projects keep getting shot down one-by-one, we will never be able to build a connected transit system that reaches all areas of the cities. 3) Population. We will grow with every generation, just like we always do. Without other options, that just means more cars, more oil, more traffic, more pollution, etc. 4) Climate change. Yes it's real. Yes, we are most likely causing it. Sorry if you don't agree, but no matter how inconvenient it may be, our society does need to quickly recognize this and realize that it's in all of our best interest to cut carbon emissions. 5) Tourism. I recently spent some time in Boston, NYC, Seattle, and Portland. All of them have excellent transit systems that are by far the best and most efficient way to get around and see the cities. All of them planned ahead and are reaping the benefits. 6) Work time. A person can work on a train. They cannot work while driving. Two extra hours per day of work time for a commuter is worth a lot!

 

"will never be able to build a connected transit system that reaches all areas of the cities" Um... last time I checked, buses were doing this just fine... in the present...

 

True, but people hate buses. They're loud, dirty, and the timing is unreliable. Most cities these days are building light rail and modern streetcars because they are a much more pleasant experience.

 

I can see your points until you hit the climate change part. The major climate change proponents themselves admit that there has been no temperature increases in the past two decades, and there is unlikely to be any increase in the next decade. These people (who also gave us the Little Ice Age) cannot get it right, and I refuse to put any stock into the theories of people who are consistently wrong. In fact, looking at all of the long, long term evidence, it seems more likely that it will get COLDER before it gets warmer. I will not be waiting for a train OR a bus when it's -60 degrees...

 

Thanks for the FOX News report on climatology. Unfortunately, your whole argument falls flat by saying "there has been no temperature increases in the past two decades." One look at the chart tells us there has been. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f4/Instrumental_Temperature_Record.png

 

I don't necessarily want to respond to a "chart" someone found on wikipedia, but I will correct myself- no significant increase in temperature in the past two decades. Your chart looks really scary, but it's a temperature "anomaly" chart, and the "anomaly" is less than 1/2 of one degree- and the anomaly was LOW for most of the last century. Listen to the "climate change" proponents themselves- I'm just repeating what they are saying, which is "We were wrong, but we're still right." I can't subscribe to massive, global changes in lifestyle based on that statement.

 

It's nice that you've found some "proponents" of climate change who aren't telling you to change your lifestyle. My 9 year-old nephew told me the economy is good right now. He likes receiving an allowance, making him a "proponent" of the economy, therefore he must be right. If you weren't being so selective with your information, you would realize there are many major scientific institutions who are still warning about carbon emissions. (Here is one example: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28861757/ ) We are better safe than sorry, especially considering the actions to fight global warming create jobs and make the world a cleaner place in many ways.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Like I want to end up at the Dane County Airport, in the middle of nowhere.

 

Agreed. It would be great if it went downtown. However, I believe the plan is for it to eventually continue north from the airport up to the twin cities. Also, I'm certain that there would be plenty of bus/shuttle services that go downtown from the airport.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Scott Walker could care less about Milwaukee! His only care is about running for govenor. Don't believe a word this guys says!!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Scott Walker is actually one of our last hopes in Milwaukee..

 

So after cutting mass transit in Milwaukee and slashing funding for parks and closing all public pools, he's looking out for the inner city?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
"True, but people hate buses. They're loud, dirty, and the timing is unreliable. Most cities these days are building light rail and modern streetcars because they are a much more pleasant experience. " This comment goes to show that trains are all about feel-good perception rather than efficiency or merit. Bus lines in my neighborhood run every 10 minutes. If it is 5 minutes late, big deal. Buses are cheaper to operate and you can have more on them. Would a LRT line run every 10 minutes? Try more like 30 minutes. Madison has hybrid buses, which are cleaner and less noisy than diesel buses. Lets use Barret's trolley money to buy hybrid buses instead. BTW....I have ridden the EL in Chicago and the Metro in DC and the BART in San Fran. None were "pleasant" experiences.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
2009-11-11
2010-03-17

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr