Home / Articles / News / Cover Story /  Milwaukee’s Green Machine
  Share
Wednesday, February 25,2009

Milwaukee’s Green Machine

Fueling the local economy with ‘green jobs’ and new ideas

By Jessica Steinhoff

Green jobs have been a cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s economic recovery plan since the early days of his campaign. It’s a concept that’s gotten people roaring with energy, ideas and an appetite for progress.

But what, exactly, does this term mean? “Green jobs” seems to be so vague that it can be applied to everything from launching wind farms to building hybrid vehicles or selling secondhand clothing.

But the goal of each green job is to reduce our nation’s carbon footprint while boosting the economy. What’s more, it involves something that’s often overlooked in all of the buzz about greening the economy—changing the way we think about consumption, not just using cleaner energy sources.

In other words, those engineering the green economy in Milwaukee and beyond need to promote a cultural shift that involves less driving, more reuse and a philosophy that less is more when it comes to material goods and energy use. Supporters argue that green-jobs initiatives should benefit both blue-collar and white-collar workers, people early in their careers and people who are further along and who’ve lost their jobs due to the economic downturn.

Jobs with Environmental Benefits

Some people assume that green jobs are confined to industries that develop technologies that reduce pollution, decrease fossil fuels use or in some way reduce many people’s carbon footprints at once. Others stress sustainability-enhancing efforts of individual people at individual organizations, regardless of types of goods or services the organization offers.

While the city doesn’t have a specific definition of “green jobs,” it has a few ideas about what they might look like. These ideas tend to focus on large companies and well-established institutions such as universities, which pioneer measurable green technologies and turn them into products and services that help many people, as well as the environment.

“In general, ‘green jobs’ are those associated with products, services and technologies that have environmental benefits,” says Ann Beier, director of Milwaukee’s Office of Sustainability.

Beier notes that jobs involving the design, construction and maintenance of renewable energy sources—from wind turbines to solar panels—are obvious examples, but that jobs involving storm-water and wastewater management may also be key for greening the region’s economy. “Manufacturing done by Milwaukee’s water cluster—Badger Meter and A.O. Smith, for example—creates products that may improve water quality and lead to water conservation or energy efficiency,” she says.

However, the word “green” gets a lot of flak because it “sounds a bit tie-dyed,” says Ryan Thompson, the founder of Greener Milwaukee, a local consortium of more than 200 different stakeholders, including civic organizations, research institutions and small businesses. “What we’re really trying to communicate here is optimization,” he says. “The optimization of resources, technology, cutting-edge everything.”

Green jobs, by extension, stress innovation and economical, sustainable use of resources. Equating cost savings with Earth-saving is a paradigm shift, but it’s essential to making the movement work, Thompson says.

While the idea of dismantling our consume-and-dispose culture has only recently begun to gain momentum, green jobs aren’t as shiny and new as you might think. You may have one and not even know it, says Dan Kohler, director of the citizen advocacy group Wisconsin Environment.

“Green jobs really end up being a lot of the same types of jobs people have now, but we’ve moved to a clean-energy economy where we’re doing more with energy efficiency and better, cleaner transportation options,” he says.

The options are many: research, agriculture, manufacturing and construction, to name a few. And southeastern Wisconsin has most of the necessary building blocks: universities, farmland, factories and buildings aching for retrofits.

It’s also got a lot of folks who work in offices, restaurants and hotels—people who drive to their jobs, get takeout for lunch and work in buildings that could use less energy and make less waste.

While the latter type of job retrofit simply involves greening existing jobs, the Milwaukee region is an ideal incubator for new blue-collar and white-collar jobs in emerging environmental-technology industries, Kohler says. “For blue-collar green jobs, there’s construction and retrofitting of buildings, weatherizing homes and businesses, and manufacturing renewable-energy components such as batteries—and developing the technology that goes along with these components,” he says.

A number of area companies are already leaders in green technologies. Kohler points to Johnson Controls, which just won a contract to make batteries for Ford’s hybrid vehicles. He also stresses that the region’s researchand-development resources, both at universities and in the private sector, are strong in areas such as bioenergy and next-generation biofuels, wind and solar power, and water technologies.

Then there are all of the other white-collar jobs—from marketing to legal services—that surround the new products that are being developed in the labs and emerging opportunities such as local and regional light rail, Kohler says.

Kohler assures that the demand for these products and services is real, as does Joe Jacobsen, associate dean of the environmental studies program at Milwaukee Area Technical College (MATC).

“People are really thirsty for this stuff: They want to learn how to make their buildings more energy-efficient, use more post-consumer materials and get LEED-certified—and they want to get their employees excited about these things,” he says. “It’s just a matter of learning how.”

But energy savings isn’t the only motivation: Replacing older workers is also a factor. Jacobsen says that many local companies are seeking employees to manage energy-efficiency projects simply because their current supervisors are retiring. “[Local renewable-energy implementation firm] Franklin Energy needs 30 people today, and they’re going to need 150 next year,” he says. “And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.”

Greening the Economy

Obama set a campaign goal of developing 5 million green-collar jobs as a way to promote energy efficiency and self-reliance. The cratering of the global economy hasn’t deterred him from pushing forward with this pledge. In fact, the economic downturn may have given him an opportunity to spur green-collar job creation on a large scale.

The $787 billion federal economic stimulus package, signed into law on Feb. 17, provides $32.8 billion for clean energy, $26.9 billion for energy efficiency and $19 billion for green transportation. Of this money, $3.1 billion will fund the State Energy Program and $3.2 billion will bolster local governments’ energy-efficiency and renewable-energy projects via block grants.

The package also includes a renewable energy manufacturing credit and $500 million for the Green Jobs Act—and the 70,000 renewable-energy workers it’s expected to train—and numerous other measures to create green jobs.

Meanwhile, for Milwaukee business and community leaders, green jobs mean fuel for the local economy. Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett partnered with Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker and Tim Sheehy of Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce to launch Metro-Milwaukee Green, a countywide initiative to promote and support businesses’ efforts to adopt sustainable practices such as building retrofits, cutting-edge recycling programs and green office-cleaning programs.

Participating businesses met in January to share ideas and are currently developing energy-saving strategies custom-tailored to their offices, which they’ll present at a summit on Earth Day.

The city’s Office of Sustainability— the brainchild of an 11-member “Green Team” of local development, planning and environmental experts—has also been instrumental in bringing together the parties necessary to get several local green initiatives running.

The sustainability office and the Green Team have provided recommendations for existing job-creation efforts at the Menomonee Valley development venture, the 30th Street industrial corridor project and the Milwaukee 7 Water Council. It’s also working to make sure that southeastern Wisconsin gets a healthy piece of the Green Jobs Act cash, Beier says.

That, however, will involve tightening up the region’s definition of “green job” and showing the feds that Milwaukee-area jobs are among the greenest—and most beneficial—in the country.

What’s your take?

Write: editor@shepex.com or comment on this story online at www.expressmilwaukee.com.

Photos courtesy of WE Energies

 

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Greening any facility or business in Milwaukee will cause a ripple effect of other green jobs throughout the city. As a 'Green Cleaning' janitorial service, if our firm acquires additional 'green cleaning' contracts, we in turn will employ more personnel who will then be trained as 'green' technicians. All of our staff have remarked on how they have taken these green practices home with them and have influenced other family members. It's a win for all. www.lk-clean.com L & K Office Cleaning

 

Thanks the hope Ken, Hopefully groups like Greener Milwaukee, the city, and everything else can help make the impact our businesses need in order to green the city of milwaukee.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Green jobs: (n) a job created by taking the green out of my pocket and putting it in somebody else's. "Green jobs, by extension, stress innovation and economical, sustainable use of resources. " This sustainable resource is the American taxpayer who foot $32.8 billion for clean energy, $26.9 billion for energy efficiency and $19 billion for green transportation in the latest spend-fest.

 

We have been putting of "green energy" since the 1970's when gas fist became expensive. The price fell and all was well again. Green energy is the path to a cleaner, sustainable, energy independent nation. Other counties are taking the lead like Germany. The cost of not encouraging and growing the profitability of green energy is price we will pay and gets higher the longer we put it off. Oil, natural gas and oil are not our future! If you don't like spending on green energy, you shouldn't like wasting huge amounts of money and soldiers in a war we can't win. I war that has not made us safe or gone after the country of origin for many of the original terrorists of 9/11. I don't believe one hijacker was Iraqi. So tell me has the money and lives in Iraq been spent wisely? Where is the return on investment that Green initiatives can provide.

 

WHOA! (to the comment below)Before you needlessly expand your carbon footprint by wasting energy on responding to me, ask yourself this: where the hell do I come out either in favor of or opposed to the war in Iraq? And if you can't find any reference to that effect, where the hell do you get off making those inferences? (Mr. Green)

 

So put the war aside. How about the rest of my comments? The longer we wait to seriously take on green energy initiatives the more it will cost in the long run. It's not even just a ethical question, but a global problem that we can lead on. Green energy if the path to future growth, sustainability, and a growing profitable industry. So maybe we should put off greening our energy grid until coal, natural gas, and oil cost so much we can't heat our homes or drive to work. When would you like to start? Maybe when gas is 10,15,20 dollars per gallon!

 

My comments about the war weather for or against is the cost. You complain about the cost of greening our energy grid. Do you also complain about the cost of war? Weather you support or don't support the war we are spending huge amounts of money in Iraq and on our military. So in terms of spending what will be more wasteful and what will give us less return on our investment? Green energy spending or war and military spending?

 

FIRST of all, I am fundamentally opposed to all wasteful government spending, regardless of the form it takes. I have never been a supporter of the war in Iraq, and certainly don't call that an investment. SECOND, I am not opposed to exploring alternative energy and I support individuals and corporations which take responsible steps in terms of energy use and protecting the environment. I only think that private individuals and companies should do so independently and willingly, and not at the hands of exhorbitant taxation and regulation. What I am categorically opposed to is Environmentalism as the default religion for many (not all) atheists and liberals. I think the evidence for certain theological terms such as "global warming" is weak, the media coverage lopsided to say the least, and the environmental movement in general is a smoke-screen to usher in a disasterous social agenda. I am also categorically opposed to the so-called "stimulus" and the waste that government spending represents.

 

for some out-of-the-dominant-environmental-orthodoxy, check out some of these links: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/the_farce_of_global_warming.html http://georgereisman.com/blog/2008/02/nature-of-environmentalism.html http://dougreich.blogspot.com/2009/02/climate-change-delusion.html http://mu-warrior.blogspot.com/search/label/Global%20Warming

 

So even if global warming does not exist what is the energy of your future? I suppose government never had it's hand in regulating or subsidizing the following: banking, auto, medical, pharmaceutical,insurance, energy companies, and oil companies. It's all about focus and where the focus should be. Unless your calling for the government to dissolve lets solve the problems of the future today. Let's be an example and lead the globe down a new path of responsibility. I guess clean energy and efficient mass transit are unworthy goals.

 

I took a look at your sites. Your even crazier than I thought. Now here is a site for you! It climate change for real or is the tons of lobbing money from oil companies meant to confuse you just as real! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_denial

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
2009-11-11
2010-03-17

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr