Home / News / Taking Liberties /  Prisons for Profit
  Share
Wednesday, February 18,2009

Prisons for Profit

By Joel McNally
 

One of the most shocking revelations of recent weeks was that two judges in Pennsylvania potentially destroyed the lives and futures of thousands of juveniles by incarcerating them for minor offenses in exchange for millions of dollars in bribes and kickbacks from a private prison company.

Even more shocking is that some officials in Wisconsin, including Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke, advocate private prisons for profit in our own state, which could open the door to the same kind of corruption and human destruction here.

The truly evil plot in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., began in 2002 when Senior Judge Michael Conahan and Judge Mark Ciavarella Jr. conspired to shut down a county-run detention center and incarcerate juveniles instead in two privately operated juvenile prisons.

From then on, it was incarcerate, baby, incarcerate. Ciavarella’s juvenile court oper ated like a conveyor belt. Young people were brought before him without an attorney, given hearings usually lasting only a minute or two and summarily sentenced to months in juvenile prison.

Beginning in in Milwaukee 2003, Ciavarella incarcerated more than 5,000 juveniles, many of them first offenders charged with minor crimes.

Those who accuse the criminal justice system of incarcerating poor, minority defendants to create profits for the prison industrial complex got all the evidence they needed to confirm their worst suspicions.

Conahan and Ciavarella pleaded guilty in federal court to wire fraud and income tax fraud for taking more than $2.6 million in kickbacks from a private prison company for keeping its facilities filled.

As eye-popping as the money was, it was trivial compared to the untold damage to children’s lives. Anyone familiar with criminal justice knows once a young person gets caught up in the system, he or she may never get out. Incarceration destroys opportunities for education and employment that can affect young people for the rest of their lives. Cutting off opportunities for legitimate employment feeds crime and threatens community safety.

Incarceration, the most expensive punishment, should be reserved for those who are truly dangerous and need to be separated from society to protect us all. For other offenders, reclaiming lives through drug treatment, education and job training is far cheaper and makes the community safer.

Private prisons have absolutely no financial interest in rehabilitation. In fact, recidivism increases the value of their stock. The more people they can incarcerate again and again, the higher their profits. Despite being discredited by the experience in Pennsylvania, private prisons, outlawed in Wisconsin, recently picked up a powerful new advocate in Milwaukee County.

Clarke on the Attack

Whenever Sheriff David Clarke drops out of the headlines for a while, all he has to do is pen one of his provocative public essays promoting some right-wing cause. As one of the few African-American politicians to be warmly embraced by conservative talk radio, Clarke knows all the right buttons to push, frequently attacking other black public officials.

Clarke outdid himself when he attacked state Sen. Lena Taylor for suggesting the multibillion-dollar state budget deficit should finally push the Department of Corrections to reduce Wisconsin’s over-incarceration of nonviolent offenders to pursue cheaper and more effective alternatives.

Clarke advocated building even more prisons in Wisconsin using funds from President Barack Obama’s economic stimulus program intended to create jobs.

But because Clarke thinks everybody in government is incompetent but him, he doesn’t think the state should run all those prisons he dreams about building. “My suggestion,” Clarke wrote, “is for the state Legislature to enact real reform by repealing the prohibition on operating private prisons in Wisconsin. … Government never does anything more efficiently and effectively than the private sector. It’s why people rely on FedEx and UPS instead of the U.S. Postal Service to have a package delivered.”

Even ignoring Clarke’s comparing of human beings to junk mail, there is something bizarre about a Milwaukee politician advocating prisons as a jobs program. Incarceration is a major barrier to employment in urban areas.

Milwaukee leaders long have suspected that rural legislators promote incarceration simply to provide jobs for small-town whites guarding big-city blacks.

Wisconsin incarcerates a higher percentage of its African-American population than any other state in the union, according to The Sentencing Project, a national research organization. Although blacks form only 6% of the state population, they’re almost 50% of the state’s prison population.

What makes Clarke’s ideas truly dangerous is that he has just been given expanded authority over all of Milwaukee County’s incarceration facilities. Clarke, an African- American who has a good job, thinks a great jobs program for unemployed blacks would be building more prisons to put themselves in.

Clarke sees human beings in conflict with the law as a source of big profits for private companies, just as two corrupt judges in Pennsylvania did.

What’s your take?

Write: editor@shepex.com or comment on this story online at www.expressmilwaukee.com.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Your article relates to the proposed new drinking age limit to 18. As we were made to believe, drunk driving was the number one killer for teenagers, so the government changed the minimum drinking age to 21. Although teenagers still drink, this law has been successful in decreasing the death rate for teens. Recently, the federal government has suggested that the drinking age be lowered to 18 years of age in order to increase tax revenue. (If they are looking for ways to increase tax revenues, then why are they cutting taxes? It’s the old government tactic; raise taxes where it’s least noticeable). Some states even suggested relaxing laws that limited the hours and days to sell alcohol. Personally, I don’t think there should be special laws on when and how alcohol can be purchased nor do I don’t think there should an age limit because then drinking becomes a passage ceremony into young adulthood leading to abuse. Aside from my opinion, I do have an issue with the rationale for lowering the drinking age. First, this will cause more DUI’s. DUI’s send non-criminals to jail. Non-criminals with DUI’s, misdemeanor or felon, cannot get jobs. If prisons become privatize, the more DUI’s they get, the more money companies make. Actually, I am surprised that the government would want to privatize prisons because by housing out-of-state prisoners, the state government makes money, which is why the USA has more people in jail than any other country. Conspiracy or not, the government only wants to make money and alcohol and arrests is one way to do it. If we lower the drinking age to 18, we have to lighten up on the laws. DUI’s should go back to 1.0%. Under the old Wisconsin law, a person could get one DUI every five years at 1.0, then the charges were dropped. Now that charge is for life, which is extremely harsh. When a person gets one DUI, it is a misdemeanor. When he gets his second non-accident DUI, even 25 years later, he has committed a felon. Yes, drinking and driving is dangerous and we need to be proactive. However, convicting 20% (and climbing) of the population with DUI’s causes more harm than solves problems. Something is wrong when cars cannot park over night on the street. When a person leaves a bar, he is less concerned about his toxicity and more concerned about not having his car towed – so he drives it home. For every DUI, there are 200 more driving drunk. But that does not mean there are 200 accidents. 60% of accidents are caused by sober people. Clearly, punishment for DUI’s are too harsh. Lowering the drinking age and passing harsher laws on DUI’s is a money making scheme by this government who pretends to care about it’s people who put him there in place. Moreover, this lessens his chance to work, and there is no government funding for that, even though government created the problem.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Incarceration is even profitable for government run prisons. There are far too many people being incarcerated for traffic violations, failure to appear and other misdomeaners. Our judicial system is not about justice it is about profit....our system no longer works...it breeds more harm than good and needs a complete overhaul. There is no such thing as innocent until proven guilty...anyone can claim that you've committed a crime against them, and with the right ignorant sherrif or policeman, which correctly describes most, you will find yourself sitting in a roach infested hole, being fed food that is not fit for human beings and being monitored by sadistic people who are worse than those they are guarding. As citizens, we must act now to reform the system or what is left of justice will be a memory...

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
If you really want to know what is going on, please look into the huber system in Milwaukee. Since you are speaking on Sheriff Clarke and his disregard for human life, I encourage you to look into how much money is moving through the Milwaukee County Jail. Since the Community Correctional Center has closed down, the huber system has been funneled into the Milwaukee County Jail. Not only is finding or keeping a job in huber nearly impossible, if fact there are a limit of slots in the program. Because of this, inmates are pushed through and usually lose their jobs due to harassment policies the Clarke passes down to his subordinates. Once an inmate loses his job, he/she is quickly brought to the House of Corrections in Franklin to follow out the rest of his/her sentence. However, to the legal system, Clarke looks good because there are always slots open for huber for newly sentenced inmates to move right into and lose there job. Rinse and repeat. Pretty ugly if you ask me. Really it comes down to this. Milwaukee does not have to pay for a run down huber building. They can sell the building or destroy it and make money off the profits. Second, the Milwaukee County Jail gets reimbursement from the Federal Government for housing huber inmates. Thirdly, the most sickening is the fact that the Milwaukee County Jail makes over 3.2 Million dollars of huber inmates labor yearly. If you Clarke knows a good banker, they will be able to monetize that profit nine times under Federal Reserve banking regulations. Truth be told, Clarke is evil and corrupt. His connection with the Feds and US Marshalls is something that goes unnoticed as well. I find it scary that no body speaks up about this man.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>