Home News Features  Paid Sick Leave Becomes Law
  Share
Wednesday, November 12,2008

Paid Sick Leave Becomes Law

But MMAC wants it struck down

By Lisa Kaiser

Could 157,117 voters be wrong?

On Election Day, 69% of Milwaukee voters supported mandating paid sick leave for workers at private companies in the city. But the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce (MMAC) is trying to reverse that decision.

The business organization has filed a notice of claim with the city, putting City Hall on notice that it may sue to strike down the ordinance.

According to a memo drafted by attorneys at Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, MMAC does not believe that the city has the power to require employers to provide up to nine paid sick days per year. It also believes that MMAC’s members would “suffer financial injury” if they are forced to comply with the ordinance.

Milwaukee joins Washington, D.C., and San Francisco in requiring paid sick days and, at least in San Francisco, no “financial injury” has been reported.

In fact, the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, which represents restaurants in San Francisco, now supports that city’s sick leave ordinance after initially opposing it. “The mandate is affordable, considering the public benefit,” Kevin Westlye, the group’s executive director, told the Los Angeles Times.

Respecting Voters

The ordinance requires private companies that employ more than 10 workers to provide nine paid sick days per year, while companies that employ fewer than 10 workers must provide five days off per year. Workers must accrue the paid time off during the year.

Roughly half of Milwaukee’s private-sector workers—about 122,230 people— did not have paid sick days until this ordinance was passed. About seven out of eight food service employees were not covered by paid sick leave policies.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor, about 80% of management-level workers nationwide have paid sick leave, while only 39% of service workers have this benefit.

9to5, National Association of Working Women organized the petition drive to place the question on the ballot. Sangita Nayak, an organizer with 9to5, said that the city should honor the will of the vast majority of Milwaukee’s voters, even though Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett opposed the ordinance. “This is a policy decision that was passed by Milwaukeeans and should be respected,” Nayak said. “We hope the mayor’s office is doing what they need to do to move this forward quickly.”

Resolving Legal Issues

Julie Granger, vice president of communications for MMAC, said that the MMAC board would likely decide whether it would formally challenge the ordinance at its Nov. 17 meeting. “They are really digging into what the legal issues are and whether there would be grounds for fighting this ordinance,” Granger said. “It is not certain.”


Sherry Leiwant, of A Better Balance: The Work and Family Legal Center, helped to draft the ordinance based on language in a similar ordinance that was adopted in San Francisco in late 2006. She said that version has not been challenged in court.

Leiwant said that Milwaukee has the authority to mandate paid sick leave for employees in the private sector because federal and state laws do not cover paid sick leave. “There’s no conflict,” Leiwant said.

She said that the Milwaukee city attorney’s office reviewed the ordinance prior to it being on the Nov. 4 ballot as direct legislation—meaning that voters could ratify it directly, without a veto from the mayor or a vote by the Milwaukee Common Council.

She said that a few technical changes were requested by the city during that review process. “I think there were some ways that things had to be phrased to make it consistent with the statutes and other ordinances, just to conform with other laws on the books,” Leiwant said. “But nothing substantive was requested.”

Assistant City Attorney Tom Miller said that his office reviewed the ordinance to determine whether it fell into the scope o what was appropriate for a piece of direct legislation. He said the city attorney’s office did not work with 9to5 to help craft the language of the ordinance itself. The office routinely offers its opinion on proposed legislation developed by members of the Milwaukee Common Council. “I don’t believe that our office was asked to have any role in that,” Miller said.

Miller said the ordinance will be implemented by the city’s Department of Employee Relations, which will work out the details of compliance. Companies that employ workers in Milwaukee will be required to comply after a 90-day rulemaking period.

A Financial Hardship?

Although the MMAC memo states that the ordinance would create financial hardship for its members, Granger said the bigger issue is one of flexibility for employers. “I think this really flies in the face of being able to tailor benefits to the employee base that you have,” Granger said.

She said that the majority of MMAC’s members provide paid sick leave to their employees, but that she didn’t have an exact number of the members that do so. If their policies meet or exceed what is now required by the ordinance, they will not have to make any changes.

Although MMAC is predicting that the new ordinance would have a negative impact on Milwaukee’s economic future, Granger said that MMAC has not determined the total cost to employers of either providing paid sick days or of administering the new requirements. “I think it’s going to be a different cost for every business,” Granger said.

However, a study by the nonpartisan Washington, D.C.-based Institute for Women’s Policy Research (IWPR) found that Milwaukee businesses would save $15 million per year because of the new requirements, because paid sick days would lead to less turnover and higher productivity.

What’s your take? Write: editor@shepex.com or comment on this story online at www.expressmilwaukee.com.

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
Bob
Just one more reason NOT to locate a business in Milwaukee. High taxes, crime, poorly trained workforce, etc. Any business that is sold on SE WI will now be more likely to locate in the burbs. Any business that can look nationwide, why the heck would you locate here? States like Texas (hmmm wonder why its the fastest growing state?) bend over backwards to attract business. Low taxes, better climate, better regulations. This law will have just the opposite effect, it will make it harder to make a decent living in Milwaukee!
I completely agree
 
Dan is right, anyone who doesn't see this just coming back to the employees in one way or another has little common sense. Businesses are in business to make a profit. Profit is, to put it simply, revenues minus expenses.Employees are an expense. If paid sick days increase the expense to the company, they will need to lower that expense somehow. The easiest way I see is to simply lower everyones wages a little. There, expense problem solved. The other problem I see is for the honest employees who don't call in sick unless they are really sick. They will be making up the work for the people who abuse sick days, which happens even if they are unpaid sick days. Now, many employees will take extra sick days because what the heck, they are paid anyway!
 
Maybe this is best addressed at the federal level like the Mayor has stated. I do support this kind of law. What has happened over the last 30-40 years? Unions are weaker than ever, the top 1% is getting far richer. CEO pay is about 400 to 900 times the adverage worker. When did profits override the human factor over treating employees with respect and reward them with fair levels of compensation? It's time for the axe to swing back a little. Maybe small business should be exculed, but they are required to provide less. Also, I get 5 sick days. Under this law I would get 10. Would I use all 10 as real sick days? No, Maybe. I have a son and may need to take him to the doctor, ect. Also, the sick days not used could be used to save for a system of short-term disability. Will some people abuse sick days? Maybe. I bet they are the same ones that don't show if they have a sick or not! Everyone should have the basic right to sick days if they are not missing work on a regular basis.
 
dan
Have you considered that employers may pay their employees less to make up the difference?
 
I think the people who oppose this law must have it made with sick days at their job. For the more employed underpriveliged under-insured worker, this is going to help them take time off when they are sick, without hurting their paycheck to paycheck survival. businesses that do open that are new should just take these days into consideration as part of there studies for their books before opening, Yes this economy has hit hard times, but if someone has it good enough for a bank to give them money to open up a business, that business should pass on some of that good fortune to their employees. Yes this might be a struggle for a new business, but it will also be a struggle for the employee, and if the employer offers this to their employees it could also create a bond which will show the employee that the business cares(for a change) and therefore create an employee that will work harder for that company.
One more thing: "Yes this might be a struggle for a new business, but it will also be a struggle for the employee," Yeah, it will be a real struggle for the employee because they won't have a job as entrepreneurs start their businesses elsewhere...
Are you joking? "if someone has it good enough for a bank to give them money to open up a business, that business should pass on some of that good fortune to their employees." So, I mortgage my house and borrow money to the hilt, risking bankruptcy to start a business and someone who I give a job to (they don't have to work for me if they don't like the terms ... you don't have to date someone whose values you don't agree with if it bothers you that much) part of my "fortune?" So, if we go into the red during a particular quarter or year and I don't make any money (read: literally don't take money out of the business that quarter/year), would they be willing to give me some of the money I paid them back or forego their wages for that period? Try starting a business before you spew non-sense such as this. The employer owes you only a fair wage - if you don't feel the compensation is fair, vote with your feet.
 
 
..Search Shepherd Express
  • Thu
    8
  • Fri
    9
  • Sat
    10
  • Sun
    11
  • Mon
    12
  • Tue
    13
  • Wed
    14
Search in Events
2009-01-08 7:30pm
Comedy
Live! Interactive! Improv Comedy For the Whole Family! Bring the kids, bring Grandma, heck, even bring the dog! Come see the longest running comedy Show in Milwaukee.
Location: Central Milwaukee
Express Milwaukee Blog Network
intergalactic misanthropic tea-drinker: Daily Twitterings
  • 09:52 Have to go to Tippe for EH. FUCK. Well, that takes a good two hours of my morning off away due to bussing. #
  • 11:34 Can't even find my buss pass. Awesome. #
  • 11:36 Pfft. But ancient bus tickets are a go. #
  • 14:39 Lawl, person [...]

..Search Shepherd Express