Home News Features  Questions for Hillary’s Zealots
Wednesday, September 3,2008

Questions for Hillary’s Zealots

Don’t tarnish Clinton’s legacy

By Joe Conason

As the Democrats convene in Denver to celebrate Hillary Clinton and nominate Barack Obama, a tiny minority of her supporters continues to behave petulantly. They whine, they bluster, they agitate. But what is it about Sen. Clinton’s repeated endorsements of her former opponent that they cannot understand? How do they honor her by undermining him?

No doubt many of her friends still feel robbed, months after her gracious concession. With considerable justification, they believe that their woman ought to be accepting the nomination of their party this week, rather than the man who took it from her. She certainly possesses the talent and experience to be a formidable national candidate, and during her life in politics she has worked very hard to earn that prize. She entered the campaign almost two years ago as a prohibitive favorite.

It is past time for the zealots to face honestly why she lost what might have been hers. Her defeat cannot be blamed on outdated or unfair party rules, on the rhetorical manipulations of the Obama campaign or even on the reflexively hostile coverage of the Clintons in the mainstream media—because a competent campaign would have accounted for all those utterly predictable factors. Those angry donors and voters should be brandishing their pitch forks at the well-compensated consultants who wasted tens of millions of dollars without developing an inspirational theme or an effective plan.

Dwelling on blame, however, is not what Sen. Clinton urged her fellow Democrats to do.

To take her at her word—as those who constantly proclaim their devotion ought to do—means joining her behind the new Obama-Biden ticket. Rather than sulking over the slights and stupidities of the pri mary, she speaks about the disastrous implications of a Republican victory as well as the policies and values she holds in common with Sen. Obama. Do the rejectionists think that her speeches on his behalf are insincere—that when she says she wants him to win, she is being false? Such assumptions are an insult to her.

McCain Isn’t a Good Alternative

Still more confounding is the threat by some of her supporters to defect to John McCain. His campaign’s latest commercial features a grinning Clinton supporter who praises his “maverick, independent streak” as well as his “experience and judgment,” and promises that “it’s OK, really” to vote for the Republican. Is this the politics of revenge? Is it the cult of personality? Is it just stubborn idiocy? Whatever else it may be, it is not OK. No, it is emphatically not OK to mislead Sen. Clinton’s supporters into lining up behind a candidate whose positions are the opposite of hers, whose judgment on many issues is woefully deficient, and whose maverick independence is no more than a memory.

Sen. McCain, too, deserves to be taken at his word—which makes it all the more astonishing that anyone who claims to have voted for Sen. Clinton would consider voting for him. He has declared his firm opposition to reproductive rights and promised to appoint Supreme Court judges who would restrict those rights. He would continue the U.S. occupation of Iraq and may well expand the war to Iran and beyond. He opposes universal health care and denounces Social Security as a “disgrace” that should be privatized. He dropped his principled opposition to the regressive Bush tax cuts and his support of immigration reform to pander to the Republican right.

Speaking of right-wing Republicans, their encouragement of the intransigent Clintonites is a clue for the clueless. The sudden affection lavished on Sen. Clinton by neoconservatives and other assorted wing-nuts could hardly be more transparent or insincere—or predictable as soon as Sen. Obama, their erstwhile favorite, secured the Democratic nomination.

Pundits who beseeched Democrats to join the Obama campaign as a crusade to destroy the Clintons now demand respect for her. But their insincerity is blatant. They merely want to exploit her most dis appointed supporters, whose eagerness to cooperate in that strategy is mystifying.

Private opinions about Sen. Obama and his chances of victory notwithstanding, Sen. Clinton clearly understands that her own political future, her family’s political legacy and the causes she holds dear will all depend on the vigor of her support for the Democratic ticket this fall. And despite persistent hisses of complaint from both the Obama and Clinton camps during the convention week, she knows there is no upside in recalcitrance and no downside in enthusiasm. As a lifelong advocate of racial and gender equality, she should appreciate the historic moment that she and Sen. Obama have the privilege to share on the public stage. None of her supporters should stoop to tarnish it.

2008 Creators Syndicate Inc.

What’s your take? Write: editor@shepex.com or comment on this story online at www.expressmilwaukee.com.

Share
  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 
0
What becomes abundantly clear in this thread of comments is that "conscience" (such a noble word to be so debased) in the new, "American Idol" lexicon has come to mean whose personality I like best. Here, if ever, is a case of endorsing the messenger, and ignoring the message. I too supported and worked hard for Senator Clinton, not because she shook my hand or showed up at a fundraiser in my neighborhood, but because I believed in what she represented - her Values(another word that has been so debased as to call for its expulsion from the lexicon until it can regain some semblance of meaning). I have no personal ax to grind with John McCain or Sarah Palin (although her incipient hypocrisy on matters as diverse as government hand-outs and personal responsibility suggest to me that she should slide right into the groove in of the current administration). I think that they are both probably nice people - but their world view is very different (never mind their proposals for what they will do if elected - which are pretty thin on the ground, as my granny used to say) from the candidate I supported. Frankly - after 8 years of voting for class President, I would have hoped that the American electorate would have moved beyond this. It is disappointing to think that so many could be so passionate about a candidate, and yet so cavalier about her goals. Perhaps it is best that she wasnt nominated after all, as I can only imagine her disappointment in seeing her "supporters" desert her for the next "American Idol."
 
0
"I like that you're scared of Palin. You know she has more experience than Obama, AND is a woman. Deal with it. Palin for 2012. " If Obama were running for Governor of the state with the 3rd smallest population in America, then yes, Palin would be qualified as having more "experience" than Obama. In terms of Federal Government experience, which is far more relatable to the office of Pres. or VP, Palin pales greatly in comparison. We're not electing a board member for an oil company, here. We're electing the Vice President. Her business "experience" means next to nothing. My question to Hillary deserters is this; how does the platform of McCain/Palin compare, in any way, to that of Senator Clinton? If you were voting for Hillary simply because she was a woman, shame on you. Shame on you for debasing the integrity of the electoral process. Hillary Clinton shares little to nothing in common with John McCain or (certainly not) Sarah Palin. Your conscience you dictate that you vote on issues. If that's the case, there's no way that you could flip-flop from Clinton to McCain. Second, we have to bunk all of this "sexist" nonsense in regards to criticizing Sarah Palin. She is being criticized for her lack of experience and lack of significant credentials. I'd feel the same way if they had selected an equally unqualified man. Same goes for all of the "racist" b.s. that's suddenly surrounding Barack Obama. I didn't hear of anyone criticizing Republicans as being racist for not supporting Obama. But it's been their first line of defense against those not supporting Palin. It shows a great deal of naivete, uncertainty and foolishness to resort to such a think when "defending" your Party's candidate.
 
0
Amen to voting "present".
 
0
With Obama's utter dearth of experience and McCain's myopic vision that serving the country is only possible behind the barrel of a gun, I fully intend to vote "present" in November.
 
0
Hmmm.... Palin isn't running for President in 2008. Let's deal in the here and now to start with. She does NOT have more experience than Joe Biden, anymore than Obama has more experience than McCain. As I said, you idiots are so willing to love & trust a candidate because of ONE speech? How ignorant can you be? Afraid of Sarah Palin? You are damned right I am. That a person with so LITTLE experience in the education of interpreting our constitution, or diplomatic tact, or foreign relations (the list would be endless) could possibly end up being Commander and Chief of our country totally nauseates me. The horrific truth that she is a working Mom of 5, passing off the caregiving duties of the younger children to her older daughter speaks volumes.
Wait...You say Palin is inexperienced because she was a mayor and governor, both executive positions. She took on Big Oil, the good ol' boy network, ended corruption, reduced taxes and reduced waste. But, Obama, the community organizer, is? The man with 150 present votes in the senate? The man who doesn't have one bill with his name attached to it? The man who's only accomplishment is getting elected? Oh, yeah, now I get it...
 
 
..Search Shepherd Express
  • Tue
    2
  • Wed
    3
  • Thu
    4
  • Fri
    5
  • Sat
    6
  • Sun
    7
  • Mon
    8
Search in Events
2008-12-02 7pm
Film
Fall 2008 Human Trafficking Awareness Week Become Aware and Take Action Come Join Trafficking Ends with Action for Fall 2008 Human Trafficking Awareness Week. Monday Dec. 1st "Trafficking in South East Asia." Tuesday Dec. 2nd "Human Trafficking: Two Sides of the Same Coin." Thursday Dec. 4th "Gina Allende Speaks on Human Trafficking in Wisconsin." All events will be held in the UWM Fireside Lounge starting at 7pm an
Location: Central Milwaukee
..Search Shepherd Express