Home / News Features /  Wisconsin's Voter ID Law: Are You Ready?
  Share
Wednesday, February 8,2012

Wisconsin's Voter ID Law: Are You Ready?

New law's implementation still uncertain

By Lisa Kaiser
 
In two weeks, Wisconsin voters will be required to present a state-approved photo ID to cast a ballot in the Feb. 21 nonpartisan primary.

While the new voter ID requirement—passed last year by the Republican-led state Legislature—sounds straightforward, the nuts and bolts of implementing it are not.

And with three pending lawsuits challenging the law's constitutionality, it isn't certain that the voter ID law will survive court challenges.

Will Voter ID Combat Fraud?

Up until last year, Wisconsin had one of the most open voting systems in the country. Prospective voters had to present proof of residency when registering to vote, but voters only had to state their name and address when requesting a ballot. That policy, along with Election Day voter registration, helped to boost Wisconsin's voter participation.

That system changed last year, however, when Republicans were able to make good on their long-standing desire to enact a voter ID law. They argued that Wisconsin had “widespread voter fraud” that they said diluted legitimate voters' ballots. They argued that on-paper felons, double-voters, out-of-state residents and voters impersonating others were illegally participating in elections.

The problem for Republicans, however, is that there is little evidence of voter fraud in Wisconsin.

In 2005, then-Democratic Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann and then-Republican U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic (now Gov. Scott Walker's attorney) led an investigation into improper voting in the 2004 election, but that turned up scant evidence of fraud. Instead, they found some clerical errors and messy record-keeping.

In 2008, Republican state Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen set up a statewide task force on voter fraud. But out of the 3 million votes cast in the November 2008 election, Van Hollen prosecuted a mere 14 improper voters, or about 0.0000046% of the electorate.

Creating Barriers to Voting

So will the new voter ID law crack down on this tiny amount of alleged fraud?

Not likely, since it won't prevent on-paper felons from voting illegally, nor will it stop double-voting or voter impersonation.

“Nothing in the new law would stop this,” said ACLU of Wisconsin Legal Director Laurence Dupuis.

What's more likely is that the voter ID law will disenfranchise between 5% and 10% of the state's voters, Dupuis said, since these potential voters lack an acceptable photo ID or would have to overcome huge barriers to obtain the underlying documents needed to receive an ID.

These potentially disenfranchised voters are primarily low-income residents, seniors, students, ethnic and racial minority voters and those with disabilities. Not surprisingly, these voters tend to support Democrats, who opposed the legislation.

These barriers are at the heart of three legal challenges that could strike down the new law either in its entirety or in part:

  • The League of Women Voters of Wisconsin has filed suit in Dane County Circuit Court alleging that the law is unconstitutional because lawmakers do not have the right to enact voting restrictions other than rules for residency, voter registration, absentee voting or excluding felons or persons who are found to be incompetent. The League argues that the voter ID law would impede the voting rights of legal voters who do not have certain types of identification, a restriction that the state constitution does not allow.

    “We're optimistic,” said the Wisconsin League's executive director, Andrea Kaminski, about the suit moving forward and striking down the law.
  • Voces de la Frontera and the Milwaukee branch of the NAACP filed suit in Dane County Circuit Court, arguing that the voter ID law illegally restricts the rights of minorities, students, veterans, people with disabilities and low-income voters.
  • The ACLU of Wisconsin and its allies have filed suit in federal court charging that the voter ID law would deprive Wisconsin citizens of their right to vote because it would create barriers to voting and charge an illegal poll tax on those who are trying to obtain a valid ID. Those most impacted are low-income voters, homeless voters, veterans, seniors and minorities.

The ACLU's Dupuis said the lawsuit could strike down the law in its entirety or the parts concerning the groups of voters who would most likely be deterred from voting.

What You Need to Do on Election Day

On Feb. 21, prospective voters will be asked to present an acceptable photo ID in order to cast a ballot. (For details, go to bringit.wisconsin.gov.)

If a voter does not have acceptable ID, he or she can cast a provisional ballot, which will be set aside. The voter will have to provide acceptable ID by the end of Friday, Feb. 24, in order for that ballot to be counted.

Dupuis said he was concerned about the provisional ballot system, since it would require these voters to obtain an acceptable ID within days—a highly unlikely event.

“This is not a good solution,” Dupuis said.

He noted that Indiana's new voter ID law allows voters to provide an affidavit explaining why they are unable to present a photo ID when voting. The Wisconsin law provides no such exemption.

The City of Milwaukee Election Commission will track the impact of the law on voters casting a ballot in the Feb. 21 primary election and report its findings to the Milwaukee Common Council.

Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Susan Edman said the city would provide greeters in polling places to help voters locate their correct ward—wards and polling sites may have changed with redistricting—and to comply with the voter ID law.

“There are a lot of changes with this election,” Edman said.

How to Vote on Feb. 21

The new Voter ID law isn't just about showing a valid photo ID at the polls. Here are some of the changes you need to know:

  • Bring a photo ID to the polls and be prepared to sign the poll book.

  • Verify your ward, district and polling place in the statewide voter database, since they may have changed in the recent redistricting process. Go to the General Accountability Board's website (gab.wi.gov) and click on Voter Public Access to verify your information. You can also contact your local municipal clerk.
  • If you want to request an absentee ballot, you must send a photocopy of your voter ID with your application. You're exempt from this requirement if you are indefinitely confined—for example, if you live in a nursing home. Feb. 16 is the last day you can request an absentee ballot.
  • The residency requirement has changed from 10 days to 28 days. If you have not lived in your current home for 10 days, you can vote in your former address' district.
  • In-person absentee dates have changed. In-person voting began on Feb. 6 and ends on Friday, Feb. 17. Voting resumes on Election Day, Tuesday, Feb. 21. You must present a voter ID to cast a ballot.
  • Prospective voters may register to vote through Feb. 17 with a photo ID and proof of residency. They may not register to vote on Monday, Feb. 20, but can register at the polls on Election Day. Neighbors and friends may not “vouch” for a prospective voter who does not have proof of residency.
  • On Tuesday, Feb. 21, polls are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Off subject -sorry. I was listening to the Milwaukee Wisconsin WTMJ Wing Nut Radio show of Charlie Sykes. His statement was "When we nominate a candidate that is when we will use real bullets (meaning President Obama)." Where is the Secret Service? This man threatened the life of the President of the United States of America and what did he mean when he said we? Is he talking about the weak minded listeners that will do his bidding? Enough of the Hate and Violence these Commie Pig Republicans spew out of there bile mouth's.

 

@jusme

What the HELL are you talking about?  Do you READ what you type before you post?  Wait...I've just been trolled.  No sane person would combine Communist with Republican and think the two are even remotely related.

 

Make sure only a certain demographic can vote and you KNOW what the outcome will be. -- (PS, just posting as a reply to jusme's off-subject comment as a way to get on page one)

Time for me to wear my "Race Sentinel" hat. Look at the news on unemployment... huge unemployment numbers of blacks in Milwaukee, and you know that MANY still live at home with momma. Since momma's name is on the utility bill or rental agreement, there is no unbiased 3rd party way this person can prove residence and be judged eligible to vote. Unlike no-busline suburb folk who cannot survive without a drivers license, many who live in momma's crib get by with no ID, especially if no 1040 taxpaying job, no pimped-out ride. Many honest, hardworking people of color often get to their late-20's before they need to get a Drivers License. This rule is designed stop YOUNG minorities from voting, not the elderly, SSI collecting, or any others who draw government benefits IN THEIR OWN NAME.

When we make sure that only those who pay enough taxes to have Uncle Sam keep some instead of sending it all back plus EIC, then the only vote we get is from those who get no direct benefits, and think they do not get any indirect benefits, so they just want their taxes reduced.

Keep this up, it will be changed back to what our Constitutional founding fathers set up, only land owners could vote. Neither his wife, nor his trusted butler, maid, overseer and farmhands could vote against the king of his castle... Listen to what I am saying about the "overseer and farmhands" who live on the owners property not being able to vote... That is just like "employees of the corporation". Plus, all you homeowners..., who would get the right to vote if your mortgage holder still holds more the 50% of your home's value? It gets worse and worse!

 

@ Waukesajuy,

No matter who the law was intended for it still doesn't change the fact that there will be a lot of eldery that will have a hard time with it.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I'm all for voter ID. Voting is serious business. If a person is serious about voting, they will find a way to get an ID. How do they buy beer and cigarettes? How to they board an airplane? We are just trying to keep the illegals from voting. And I'll admit, it helps keep the enemy from voting as well. Bonus.

 

anonymous: there is only one enemy to be concerned with in this country and it is from within. With a lower case a anonymous is one. What you just wrote is as un-American as anyone can be.

 

Dude read the article! They are mainly talking about the hadicapt and the elderly I don't think they are boarding any planes. There are alot of elderly that don't have birth certificates cause they might not have been born in a hospital or they live in a rual area and can't get to the city to pay to get a copy of their birth certificate and then drive to the dmv and stand in line for ours ust to get an ID.  This is voter supression and it's BS!!!

 

States have been issuing birth certificates longer than anyone is currently alive.  We can't go around making exceptions.  I went to college with handicapped people - they all had IDs. 

The only reason not to have an ID is because you are illegal and living off the grid.  Dishonest people don't have IDs.  I'm sure there is a 140 year old handicapped person living on a cave someplace - yep he doesn't have an ID.  But voting should be like boarding a plane, buying liquor, or driving a car.  If you want to particiapte - get a f.....ing ID and stop acting like some helpless moron.

 

jen

My grandmother is elderly and handicapped and has never driven but has always had state ID...it's a pain in the ass getting anything accomplished without one!  I totally get that there are people who get along just fine without state ID and this policy sucks for them and I'm as progressive as they come...have to say though of all the policies getting pushed through as of late, this is one of the more reasonable ones

 

Some very poor people don't have an ID either cause the can't afford a car so they never got a DL. Also if an elderly person can't find their birthcertificate then thay have to go the courthouse and pay a fee to get a copy. It's just to much of a hassle especialy when they live in rual areas and can't get to the city.

 

 

Those poor people, they hundreds of miles from the "big city."  No money, no access to a telephone. They are hermits living in caves that only venture out once every 4 years to vote.

Welcome to life in the big city. If someone has the wherewithal to get to the polls, they have enough gumption to get an ID.

 

"·        Fraud by individual voters is both irrational and extremely rare. 

* Many vivid anecdotes of purported voter fraud have been proven false or do not demonstrate fraud. 
* Voter fraud is often conflated with other forms of election misconduct. 
* Raising the unsubstantiated specter of mass voter fraud suits a particular policy agenda. 
* Claims of voter fraud should be carefully tested before they become the basis for action.

·       Legitimate cases of fraud that could be addressed by a photo identification requirement are proven to occur approximately as often as Americans are struck and killed by lightning.

·       Bush's Justice Department made prosecution of voter fraud a priority. They spent a lot of resources trying to find it and what happened was that in the entire nation they came up with about 120 cases over a five year period and about 85 were convicted."

"The problem for Republicans, however, is that there is little evidence of voter fraud in Wisconsin." The whole new Republican law is B.S.


 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
no more rounding up buses of illigals to gain Dem votes. This was huge in the Dems arsenol. Gone!!! Thank you Scott Walker. Finally doing whats right for our great State. No way Scott is going to be recalled. Too many people are pissed off about the recall and all of them are coming out to vote for Mr Walker.

 

Just keep thinking that hosie. We depend on people like you. The only people pissed off are the silant majority that did not vote in the first election. Besides that John Doe is not spoken as of yet. scott and that guy from Chicago may be room buddies.

 

The name of this idiot 'hosie' says it all. What about the phony astroturf busses of fat-assed crackers? You are all just desperate and racist scumbags. The teascrotes know they are on borrowed time. Scott The Retard Walker is going to be re-called along with the idiots in the legislature. All the repubs are going down in 2012. We The Real Americans see you for what you are and President Barack Obama will get a second term. Suck it dirtbags.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
jusme, you must work for the state. Like the other free loaders. Then I understand why you want something more for you. take from the workers and keep it for yourself.

 

hosie: YOU ARE SO STUPID. I was self employed most of my working life and never woked for the Gov. You are such a stupid little person.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
@jusme, arguing with the peeps who support this anti-American behavior is pointless, as they are under-educated, racist, fear-mongering, listen to "faux 'Not intended to be a fractal statement' News", knuckle-dragging, hopeless case GOP members

 

Cheryl Ochinero: I agree except with the knuckle-dragging, there not that far evoulved.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>