Home / News / Taking Liberties /  Hauling Away Wisconsin
  Share
Tuesday, December 13,2011

Hauling Away Wisconsin

By Joel McNally
 
In one of his signature songs, John Prine longs to return to the golden paradise of his childhood in Muhlenberg County, Ky. The sad refrain is: "I'm sorry, my son, you're too late in asking. Mr. Peabody's coal train has hauled it away."

Gogebic Taconite, an iron ore strip-mining company, can hardly wait to haul away a couple of counties that are presently located in northern Wisconsin.

In fact, Gogebic is so eager to create the Grand Canyon of the Midwest, an open-pit iron mine 1,000 feet deep, that it's been meeting privately with legislative Republicans to write a brand-new law eliminating bothersome delays to consider environmental devastation and harm to the public.

The real reason for the urgency is that any company that makes big profits by destroying enormous swaths of the landscape and threatening air and water and the natural world wants to eliminate as many public protections as possible while Republicans still control Wisconsin's governor's office and Legislature.

Wisconsin is on the brink of a recall election that could remove Republican Gov. Scott Walker and possibly several more state senators, giving control of the Senate to Democrats.

The last thing mining companies want are politicians who represent the interests of everyone in the state, Republican or Democrat. Those are the protective regulations they are out to destroy.

Wisconsin's mining regulations were created over decades by governors and legislators from both parties based on the state's actual experiences, good and bad, with the mining industry.

But Walker and his boys are really good at wiping out generations of carefully developed policy in a few weeks without listening to opposing arguments.

It is not exactly news that mining in its various forms has a long, ugly history in this country of harming the environment and ignoring the health and safety of workers to deadly and crippling effect.

The mining industry keeps coming up with ever more diabolical ways to send expendable employees after profitable minerals buried deep in the Earth.

It's not faith that moves mountains these days. It's mountaintop removal that blows off the tops of those mountain majesties and dumps the rubble into the towns and streams in the valleys below.

That doesn't mean that mining regulations can't be written to protect the Earth and all its inhabitants while still allowing mining companies to operate responsibly and turn a profit.

But mining companies should never be allowed to write their own regulations behind closed doors with Republicans who believe their corporate campaign contributors should be allowed to do anything they want.

Politicians never publicly admit they care only about the wealthiest 1%. They say removing mining regulations will create 700 jobs in Ashland and Iron counties for those poor people devastated by the economic crisis (which, come to think of it, was created by removing financial regulations).

Reducing the DNR's Role

As soon as Walker became governor, he sought to eliminate the Department of Natural Resources as a guardian of the environment by appointing as its secretary Cathy Stepp, a right-wing state senator and housing developer.

Stepp had previously ridiculed employees of the DNR for caring more about snakes and butterflies than important matters such as the profits of developers.

Well, just in case Stepp hasn't totally succeeded in ridding the department of professionals who care about natural resources, the mining deregulation bill would cut the time for the DNR to approve mining applications and eliminate opportunities for the public to object.

Most importantly, it would ease environmental protections for waterways, groundwater and wetlands. Sure, water is essential for life on this planet. But Republicans now in control don't think excessive worry about protecting our water should cut into the profits of mining companies.

The Bad River band of Chippewa whose tribal lands are downstream from the proposed mine are concerned about the toxic levels of metals and other waste left behind by other mining operations in the state.

But that proves the Republican point that there's nothing around this proposed mine that really matters to the rest of the state. Indian reservations are always located in areas nobody else cares about.

No matter how many toxins are pumped into the waterways by this iron mine, very few voters would be affected. There's really nothing much around but Copper Falls State Park and Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest—snakes and butterflies, just like the lady said. Big deal.

It seems particularly cruel to pretend that ending public protections and environmental regulations will benefit working people in the area.

Everyone knows the people left behind in the hills of Kentucky and the rest of Appalachia—among the poorest and most desperate people in America—where natural beauty has been replaced with toxic, abandoned pits and other open wounds of strip mining.

Like John Prine says, "They wrote it all down as the progress of man."

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Joel, perhaps instead of waxing poetic by quoting lines from your fave songs, perhaps you could have better made your point (which I have to infer, since you don't make it) by providing more information about what could really happen to the environment if this mine project goes forward. Do you have any evidence that this particular mine will "pump toxins into the waterways?" And are you really suggesting that we look to the Bad River Chippewa as models of environmental stewardship? You could "mine" plenty of aluminum just by picking up the beer cans along the side of the roads that go through this particular reservation. As far as regulations being made behind closed doors, try opening your own door- if you don't know every single detail of the proposed legislation, you're not listening to talk radio, reading the Journal, or watching local news... This is the most talked about issue going right now. You betray your real purpose by somehow tying the recall into this story. Wisconsin Democrats would find a reason to oppose a factory that puts out nothing but fresh air to make sure that employment in this state will not increase under Scott Walker. That is truly despicable.

 

Funny they were all for a train factory that would employ a few people to produce useless train cars. But they are against a mine that will employ thousands.  It would be mostly white people up north and Joel doesn't want to see whitey get a break, even if they are union types.  So exactly where  does Joel think we should mine for iron, coal, and such?

Those indians could care less about the pollution.  They are all millionaire casino owners now.

We need to get projects like this rubber stamped ASAP so businesses know Wisconsin is business friendly.  And we need to make sure people like Joel McNally don't get beyond the free paper or a radio station that fades out at the Waukesha Co. line.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Joel hears some hippie folks song and then thinks he's a mining expert. He's afraid this will bring jobs and Joel hates people with jobs and he hates people who earn money. He wants to be friends with the non-working kind of people -welfare queens and such. His idea of utopia is where millionaires and billionaires are forced to give the laziest people their wealth. The people left behind in the hills of Kentucky and the rest of Appalachia—among the poorest and most desperate people in America. True - that have been since the civil war and it had nothing to do with mining. A combination of incest, welfare, and Food Stamps have created that mess.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Joel McNally's article iterates a bunch of possible problems with weakly regulated mining activities. Water pollution is one of them and here is a solution. 1. Republicans love pipelines; build one from the mine to Waukesha; more jobs. 2. Transfer the mining runoff to Waukesha. 3. Waukesha wiil not have to buy water from Milwaukee and will save the taxpayers money. Thanks for listening.

 

Are those problems with THIS particular mine, or this particular legislation?  Actually, you state that Joel presents"a bunch" of "possible" problems, then you only list one.  Are there "any" "real" problems with this mine or this legislation?  Or just one "possible" problem? 

What about all the iron mines in Michigan and Minnesota?  Iron mining is primarily done with powerful magnets, not chemicals- and the water "up north" is generally full of iron anyway (we have an "iron curtain" on our well at the lake place- can't drink the stuff without it.)

The problem with the existing rules is that they preclude any reasonable investment- because of the delays they impose.  Who is going to invest in a project that might happen in 7 years??

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I'm utterly shocked that Joel "Scott Walker somehow ruined my life" McNally didn't go on a paragraph long tirade about how all these "evil concealed carry republican mining fat cats" are going to roll to these mines shooting everyone who looks at them cross eyed. Dammit Joel, you also forgot to add how a 5 year old nephew or grandson will most likely be interred as slave labor at a mine.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>