Home / News / Expresso /  Issue of the Week: Tax the Rich?
  Share
Wednesday, July 6,2011

Issue of the Week: Tax the Rich?

Plus Hero of the Week

By Shepherd Express Staff
 
It is amazing that lawmakers who advocate taxing the rich—and by rich, they are often talking about just the top 2% or 3% of the population—face such stiff resistance.

In our neighboring state of Minnesota, the government shut down when Republican lawmakers refused to increase taxes on the state's wealthiest individuals. Yet they had very little problem cutting all levels of public education and public health.

So, on a state level, how do 150,000 wealthy people win on tax issues over the other 5.5 million citizens? Public opinion polls, even those done by the conservative Wall Street Journal, show that huge majorities of Americans want to see the government tax the very rich.

One theory for why it is so difficult to pass this legislation is that it draws the ire of enough individuals who are earning $50,000 or $60,000 per year but think that someday they will become multimillionaires—even though study upon study has shown that the most common way to become a multimillionaire in America is by choosing your parents carefully and making sure they had millions of dollars when you were born.

Second, there is the argument that you don't want to tax the wealthy because they are the ones who create jobs. Yet every student of Macroeconomics 101 has studied the elements of the "Balanced Budget Multiplier" and knows that direct government spending does more to stimulate job creation than do tax cuts, especially tax cuts for the wealthy.

If we want to create jobs and boost the economy, then government should tax the wealthy and spend that money on infrastructure like high-speed rail or invest in education and hire teachers, for example. Yes, Fox News, government does create jobs—just ask all of those private companies that build highways and bridges or make the high-speed trains that are paid for with government contracts, or ask teachers, police, firefighters and trash collectors who it is that signs their checks.

Furthermore, there is no shortage of money in corporate America right now. They are sitting on tens of billions of dollars. The issue is that the private sector is not investing in America—and that is primarily due to lack of demand, and not taxes. If you tax the rich and pay the teachers and firefighters, that will stimulate demand and thereby create jobs. So the myth that taxing the rich will hurt the economy is just that: a myth. In fact, the exact opposite is true.

Is it simply that the wealthy have bullied and bribed the media and the higher education system? Is it that the media who champion the interests of the wealthy get the advertising dollars and economics professors who promote the totally discredited theories of supply-side economics get the research grant money and hefty speaker fees at conferences?

Perhaps that explains the amazing fact that, for example, Wisconsin's Fitzgerald brothers, who lead the state Assembly and state Senate and who represent some of Wisconsin's lower-income rural communities, can be the biggest champions of the rich and still get elected by voters who work hard and support a family on $25,000 or $30,000 a year.

Heroes of the Week

The Gathering of Southeast Wisconsin Volunteers

At a time when budget cuts are increasingly affecting our social safety net and a growing number of people are not sure where their next meal is coming from, the volunteers of the Gathering of Southeast Wisconsin continue to provide direct help to those who need it most. The Gathering, an interfaith nonprofit that began feeding the area's hungry and homeless in 1982, serves 10 meals weekly at three sites. The meals, prepared and served by hundreds of volunteers, feed about 100,000 individuals annually.

Additionally, the Gathering works with other nonprofit organizations to provide services including legal assistance, medical referrals and distribution of crucial supplies.

Readers who wish to volunteer their time and talents in coordinating, preparing or serving meals or to donate funds to purchase food are encouraged to call 414-272-4122 or visit www.thegatheringwis.org.

 

POST A COMMENT
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
We probably could tax the rich, those making $5 million or more per year. In theory it sounds good but I know enough of them that they have got ways of legally avoiding taxation. I know people who make $50 million a year and they pay about 15%, which is still a lot of coin. I know others that pay zero, because its all in double tax free municipal bonds. Meaningful goverment projects do stimulate the economy. But just purposely overpaying goverment workers is wasteful. Why not just print off money and hand it out? While it stimulates the economy with a short term boost, its inflationary to just thrown money and meaningless wasteful projects and hire people for make-work do-nothing jobs. Why not just have 5 teachers in every classroom? Because their is no ROI. We need to crack down hard on any goverment spending. Too much of it ends up in the hands of poor people that don't pay taxes at all and don't produce any meaningful products or services.

 

But poor people send nearly every dime the get just to survive which means that the money is used to buy food and clothing.  This means that clerks, shelve stockers,  and check out people are hired and companies make money.  Even people of moderate incomes spend most of what they get so government projects like road and bridge repairs again creates wages and profits which are spent.  All this work is done by private companies.  If the government does not fund it, then it is not done and our infrastructure falls to pieces.  Try doing 65 down a highway filled with pot holes in a semi and you will soon appreciate that these things are not waste but solid unvestments in keeping America stong and working.

 

I agree completely. On the tax part, I feel we need to eliminate the earned income credit and make benefits also taxable. I also feel a straight 25% across the board for a tax rate. It would only be fair, everyone would have to pay the same.  Including the bottom earners.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Tax the Rich! Tax the Rich! Umm, you might want to check actual statistics, because they ARE taxed exponentially higher than the rest of us. Here are actual stats the author probably doesn't want you to see: http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html

 

Is there a point here?  In the US we do not have a regressive tax system or flat tax system, but rather a PROGRESSIVE TAX SYSTEM.  The more you earn, the more you pay.  In theory.  Like David J. Livingston said above, his fat cat friends are masters at hiding their REAL wealth through various tax shelters, so one would reason that the best place to hit them would be through the federal income tax.  Tax the rich at 90% like we did in the Eisenhauer days.  The rich will manage tosqueak by, they always do.

Let's not forget, the über rich who control America's multinational corporations, the same ones who talk about "class wars" and threaten to lay off more people whenever the prospect of them paying more in taxes comes up, are the very people responsible for our exploding national debt.  The people who helped Bush and Obama get elected, the Halliburtons and GEs of the world, have benefited immensely from America's two hot wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, on top of our "humanitarian efforts" in Libya and covert operations in Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen.  6 wars and a "financial disaster" that was engineered by criminals on Wall Street to be a giant wealth transfer to the nation's already bloated rich.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
The top 5% already pay for almost 60% of federal taxes. With that amount only at $160.000. If you make only 34k you are in the top 50%. Paying for 50% of people to do absolutely nothing productive for themselves or society.

 

In America, the 400 wealthiest individuals own as much wealth, assets, and property as the bottom 50% of income earners.

 

Who says anyone is paying for 50% of the people to do nothing? Tell that to the person who is earning only 25K, and still does not get any direct handouts! They still buy food and clothes, pay for gas, pay utility bills and rent. They still pay in to Paul Ryan's social security and medicare. What do you mean they are not productive, and THEREFORE MUST BE CUT OFF! That 400 wealthiest owns as much as the bottom 50% is flawed and deceptive... the wealth being considered is NET wealth. For everyone who is in on-site command of a home whose GROSS value was reduced to 150,000, but also has a mortgage of 150,000, that is a NET of ZERO. --- Even a member of that 400 has huge debt to balance off against their gross holdings. They would be fools to not have their money working for them. Re-figure that by GROSS VALUE THAT THEY ARE IN CONTROL OF.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
"direct government spending does more to stimulate job creation than do tax cuts, especially tax cuts for the wealthy." This is plain WRONG. The Shepherd Express staff apparently are the ones who need to go back & study Macroeconomics 101. Stop printing LIES as fact!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Well lets see, if I was making millions of dollars and had millions in assets I'd probably just invest in double tax free bonds and real estate investment trusts. I'd be making a good income and barely paying any taxes. So its really silly to tax the rich because many don't have taxable incomes. But go ask some protester at the Capitol what a real estate investment trust is and they will say "duh, what". What next an asset tax? Super rich people will just move to tax haven countries if we oppress them too much. Sure government spending creates jobs. But are they real jobs or make work jobs. Paying teachers for sick days, pensions, health care, and wages higher than private school teachers , etc that is the same as just printing off money and handing it out for free. Giving away food stamps so poor people can eat at a pop and chip buffet, doesn't really work because they refuse to get jobs. We don't need the government to create jobs and just of waste of money. We live in a world were each person can simply go out and create their own job. Just start a business and work. Since we started cracking down on illegal immigrants, we have huge labor shortages on farms. So there are plenty of jobs in the agriculture business. We would be so much better off stopped paying cowards not to work. Jobs are always and everywhere all the time - without government help.

 

 
 
Today in Milwaukee
CityGuide2012_banner_410x93_040512.jpg
SpringGuideToHigherEd2012_410x93.jpg
SAG_Click2012.jpg
Express234x120.gif

Join Us at Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr


 
 
 
*/?>