Because this is a census year, the state Legislature and governor are charged with drawing not only the new boundaries for the state legislative districts, but also for the state’s congressional districts.
The new maps, like any piece of legislation, must pass both houses and be signed by the governor. For the past four decades no one party controlled both houses of the Legislature and the governor’s office in the post-census legislative session, so the two parties either had to compromise on a map or roll the dice and have the courts draw the new legislative map.
This year, however, the Republicans control everything. It’s almost certain that the Republican leaders of both houses will be able to come to an agreement about redistricting and carve up the state to suit their own political needs. Wisconsin is considered a swing state that votes marginally Democratic at the top of the ticket, especially in a presidential election cycle. For example, Wisconsin hasn’t voted for a Republican president since 1984. In a gubernatorial year, the top of the ticket is usually a little less Democratic. This past election was an unusual election.
Changes
at the State Level
So how do
you take a basically 50%-50% state and create districts that will ensure a
majority of Republican legislators? By carefully redrawing the boundary lines,
the Republicans will take the Democratic-majority districts and make them much
more Democratic—basically concentrating Democrats into overwhelmingly
Democratic districts. They will try to make the traditionally Republican
districts a little less Republican and the competitive districts more
Republican. A 65% Democratic district, for example, may become an 80%
Democratic district while a 65% Republican district may become a 60% Republican
district, still safe enough for a Republican to easily win.
But the
competitive districts will become much less competitive. A 53% Democratic
district that could easily go Republican in a good Republican year will
probably become a 57% Republican district, and a 53% Republican district will
become a 58% or 60% Republican district. Much of this depends on the part of
the state in question, but the current computer software is very sophisticated
and it will not be hard to draw very political lines. Gerrymandering has never
been so easy now that we have great computer programs, so say goodbye to the
traditional swing districts. Look for up to about 60 “safe” Republican seats in
the state Assembly, for example, and roughly 40 “safe” Democratic seats. The
redistricting will allow Republicans to remain in power at the state level
until the next U.S. Census in 2020.
Are there
any constraints on the party in power as they draw the new map? They do have to
adhere to a few rules as they carve out the new districts. Although there is
some flexibility, districts must have equal populations. New boundaries must
comply with the Voting Rights Act and minority-heavy districts must be
reasonably compact and proportional. The districts can’t have outlandish
boundaries that tie together voters who have nothing in common. And, lastly,
the “candidate of choice” of that minority group must have a reasonable chance
of winning. So Republicans will begin redistricting under these parameters.
Can these
districts be challenged? Yes, but they are most likely to be challenged in
state courts, since federal courts have deferred redistricting cases to the
state level. And since conservatives—including the two ethically challenged
conservative justices who were elected in 2008 and 2007—are in the majority on
the state Supreme Court, they’ll likely sign off on any Republican
redistricting plans.
Changes
in Congressional Representation
Before the
Nov. 2 election, Wisconsin
sent five Democrats and three Republicans to the U.S. House of Representatives.
The past election changed this, and look for this change to last for at least
the next 10 years.
Two
Democratic seats are likely to remain quite safe—one in Milwaukee,
which is held by Congresswoman Gwen Moore, and one in Madison, held by Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin.
In fact, these districts will almost certainly become even more Democratic as
the Republicans try to concentrate Democratic voters into these areas.
Three Republican
districts are definitely safe, too—those held by Congressmen Jim Sensenbrenner,
Paul Ryan and Tom Petri.
But Republicans
will turn the two districts in the northern part of the state—currently in the
hands of Democrats but which will be controlled by Republicans come
January—into much safer Republican districts.
The last
congressional district, which runs along the Mississippi, will probably stay a swing
district. It will be very difficult to make it more Republican at the same time
one is making the district north of it more Republican as well. There just
aren’t enough Republicans in the area to make all the districts safe for
Republicans.
So instead
of the current 5-3 split in the congressional delegation favoring the Democrats,
the Republicans will have five fairly safe seats and the Democrats will be down
to two safe seats. And Wisconsin
will have one competitive congressional district out of eight.
Again, these
districts can be challenged in the courts. But if a challenge is successful,
the Republican-controlled state government will simply address the issues the
court objected to and modify the maps to pass judicial review.








Most states do it this way. One of the benefits of winning. Democrats were able to do the same thing whenever they had this much control.
Oh... you mean the last time the Democrats had the power in ALL branches of our state government on a census year... When might that have been?
I would hope that the district lines are drawn, not to make certain seats more or less safe, but with regard to logical geographical features, like county lines, major thoroughfares, rivers, etc. As one who put a lot of effort into the attempted defeat of a TERRIBLE incumbent, the last thing I want is to make seats more safe. Better that all seats are at least marginally competitive, than that they be so safe that incumbents are free NOT to mount a real campaign.
Now on to the task of holding the winners accountable.