Even though it is now just one of
11 straight victories for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Wisconsin
presidential primary could go down in history as the turning point that
secured the Democratic presidential nomination for the nation’s first
African- American president.
Obama’s blowout 17-point victory
here over New York Sen. Hillary Clinton finally erased any claim
Clinton had of greater appeal to significant groups of voters in
America. In previous contests around the country, Obama already had
been running far ahead of Clinton among young voters, college-educated
voters, African-American voters, white male voters and working
professionals making more than $50,000 a year.
In Wisconsin,
Obama continued to dominate those groups, but he also added blue collar
voters, Latino voters and, in a stunning shift, ran even with Clinton
among white women. Although African-American and Latino voters were not
a major factor in blindingly white Wisconsin, their support for Obama
was among his highest for any demographic groups yet. Obama took more
than 90% of the black vote statewide and, on the South Side of
Milwaukee, swept one voting district with a large Latino population by
more than 90% as well.
Just about the only remaining voters
who prefer Clinton over Obama are white women over 60. That’s a pretty
slim reed on which to hang presidential hopes, especially since the
Republicans are poised to nominate septuagenarian John McCain, the
heartthrob of any nursing home, hands down.
The support for
Obama is so undeniably broad that all the usual insults political
supporters try to use to denigrate voters on the other side sound
ridiculous. In Ohio, a union official introducing Clinton crudely
attempted to smear Obama supporters as “latte-drinking, Prius-driving,
Birkenstock-wearing, trust-fund babies.”
Oh, like those
latte-drinking Teamsters, who just endorsed Obama? Do all those union
households and African Americans in Milwaukee really have secret trust
funds we haven’t been told about? Does the white, working class of
Green Bay wear Birkenstocks with their Packers jackets?
Signs of Desperation
Since
Wisconsin, Clinton herself has been totally baffled as to how to run
against Obama. She showed up at the debate in Texas last week as Sybil.
Clinton’s multiple personalities swung violently back and forth from
being honored to be on the same stage with Obama to attacking him as a
glib fraud who had no right to share the stage with her.
Obama
obliterated Clinton’s attacks on his eloquence as an insulting
suggestion that millions of voters were “delusional” and that when they
woke up they would somehow realize she was the best candidate. Still,
Clinton foolishly persisted with the charge that Obama had plagiarized
by using lines in a Milwaukee speech suggested to him by Massachusetts
Gov. Deval Patrick, his national campaign co-chair. The audience wasn’t
having it—and when you are in a make-or-break political debate, it’s
never good to draw boos.
Since then, Clinton’s campaign has
taken even stranger turns. Speaking in Ohio, she claimed to be
absolutely outraged that Obama had sent mailings tying her to NAFTA,
the unpopular trade agreement championed by her husband, and
criticizing her universal health care plan.
“Since when do
Democrats attack one another on universal health care?” Clinton asked.
Well, since Clinton began months ago attacking Obama on universal
health care in nearly every speech, claiming his plan would leave out
15 million Americans.
The Clinton campaign, which in Iowa
forwarded a hoax e-mail falsely accusing Obama of being a Muslim, has
begun circulating a picture in Ohio of Obama dressed in traditional
Kenyan garments on a trip to Africa in 2006. One possible
interpretation in white, Midwestern Ohio is that there is something
terribly African and possibly un-American about Obama.
The
angry, flailing Clinton campaign reflects desperation. She’s falling
further and further behind in delegates. Obama’s supporters used to
worry about Superdelegates undoing the will of the voters by throwing
their support behind Clinton despite Obama’s growing lead in states
won, elected delegates and the popular vote. But the Superdelegates—
Democratic members of Congress, governors, mayors and party
activists—have to face election themselves in their states.
Not
only could going against the voters be political suicide, but it would
undoubtedly create an angry split in the Democratic Party that would
blow the Democrats’ perfect opportunity to recapture the White House
following the disasters of the Bush presidency at home and abroad.
Superdelegates
already have started to move to Obama. The movement will become a
tsunami as it becomes clear that Clinton cannot pick up enough
delegates in Ohio or Texas on March 4 to slow Obama. After that, the
party will not want Clinton continuing to try to inflict damage on
Barack Obama, the most exciting nominee the Democratic Party has had in
decades.
Clinton will drop out of the race shortly after March 4.
What’s your take? Write: editor@shepex.com.







